Gender, Faculty, and Doctoral Education in Science and Engineering
Initiatives to increase the numbers of women faculty derive in part from understandings that the representation of women faculty is crucial for the culture and climate of the university and for the development of students’ capacities and potential. Faculty are consequential for students through what they convey, demonstrate, and exemplify. This is true throughout educational stages. But it is the case particularly for doctoral education. For graduate students, the impact of faculty is broad and deep—affecting the way students acquire knowledge, values, norms, skills, and beliefs (Zuckerman 1977). Graduate students report that faculty are the single most important aspect of their education (Clark and Corcoran 1986; Katz and Hartnett 1976). That influence, however, may be for better or worse, positive and/or negative (as is the case for undergraduate education; see Astin and Sax 1996). For those students who enter academic careers, the effects of their graduate school faculty are often so strong as to provide perspectives and orientations that guide their lifetimes of teaching and research (Trow 1977:15).
KeywordsFemale Student Male Student Female Faculty Woman Faculty Doctoral Education
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Astin, Helen, and Linda Sax. 1996. Developing scientific talent in undergraduate women. In The equity equation: Fostering the advancement of women in the sciences, mathematics, and engineering, ed. C. Davis, A. Ginorio, C. Hollenshead, B. Lazarus, and P. Rayman. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
- -. 1991. Gender, environmental milieu, and productivity in science. In The outer circle: Women in the scientific community, edited by H. Zuckerman, J. Cole, and J. Bruer, pp. 188–204. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
- -. 1996. Women, academia, and careers in science and engineering. In The equity equation: Fostering the advancement of women in the sciences, mathematics, and engineering, edited by C. Davis et al., pp. 265–289. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
- -. 1999. Gender, hierarchy, and science. In Handbook of the sociology of gender, edited by J. S. Chafetz, pp. 441–457. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.Google Scholar
- -2000. Organizational environments and doctoral degrees awarded to women in science and engineering departments. Women’s Studies Quarterly 28 (Spring/Summer): 47–61.Google Scholar
- -, and Vincent Ferri. 1992. Women, men, and their attributions for success in academe. Social Psychology Quarterly 55 (Summer): 257–271.Google Scholar
- Katz, J., and Rodney T. Hartnett. 1976. Recommendations for training better scholars. In Scholars in the making, edited by J. Katz and R T. Hartnett, pp. 261–80. Cambridge: Ballinger.Google Scholar
- National Research Council. 1998. Trends in the early careers of life scientists, Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
- Trow, Martin. 1977. Departments as contexts for teaching and learning. In Academic departments, edited by D. E. McHenry and Associates, pp. 12–33. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
- Zuckerman, Harriet. 1977. Scientific elite, New York: Free Press.Google Scholar