Advertisement

A National Profile of Academic Women in Research Universities

  • Helen S. Astin
  • Christine M. Cress
Chapter
Part of the Innovations in Science Education and Technology book series (ISET, volume 15)

Abstract

During the last three decades, the pool of female Ph.D. recipients potentially available for academic appointments has increased dramatically. In 1977, women earned 25 percent of awarded doctoral degrees. A decade later (1987), this percentage had risen to 35 percent. By 1996, women constituted 40 percent of the total number of doctorates and 47 percent of the pool of U.S. doctoral recipients (National Research Council 1996). The representation of women faculty within American higher education institutions, however, has not increased at the same rate. For example, in 1972–73 women represented 22 percent of all faculty across academic ranks. By 1982, they occupied 27 percent of faculty positions, and by 1995–96 women accounted for 35 percent of all faculty (Vetter and Babco 1986; Sax, Astin, Arredondo, and Korn 1996). In other words, there has been a relatively slow rate of gender integration in the academy (West 1995).

Keywords

Academic Rank Russell Sage Foundation Woman Faculty Document Reproduction Instructional Technique 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aguirre, A., Jr. 1994. Perceptions of the workplace: Focus on minority women facuity. Initiatives 56 (3): 41–50.Google Scholar
  2. Aisenberg, N., and Harrington, M. 1988. Women of academe: Outsiders in the sacred grove, Amherst: The University of Massachusetts Press.Google Scholar
  3. Astin, Helen S. 1969. The woman doctorate in America. New York: Russell Sage Foimdation.Google Scholar
  4. -, and Alan E. Bayer. 1973. Sex discrimination in Academe. In Academic women on the move, eds. A. S. Rossi and A. Calderwood. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  5. -, et al. 1997. Race and ethnicity in the American professoriate 1995–96, Los Angeles: Higher Education Research Institute, UCLA.Google Scholar
  6. Bellas, M. L. 1997. Disciplinary diflferences in facuity salaries: Does gender bias play a role? Journal of Higher Education 68 (3): 299–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Boice, R. 1993. New faculty involvement for women and minorities. Research in Higher Education 34 (3): 291–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. 1990. Women faculty excel as campus citizens. Change 22 (5): 39–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chamberlain, M. K., ed. 1988. Women in academe: Progress and prospects. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  10. Dickens, C. S. 1993. Collaboration in the research and scholarship of feminist women faculty. ASHE Annual Meeting Paper. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 365 188.Google Scholar
  11. Elmore, G. C, and M. E. Balmert. 1995. A profile of college and university faculty: Minority and women in advertising, communication, journalism, media studies, public relations, and related fields. Journal of the Association for Communication Administration (2): 66–81.Google Scholar
  12. Ferber, M. A., and J. W. Loeb, eds. 1997. Academic couples: Problems and promises. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  13. Finkel, S. K. 1994. Childbirth, tenure and promotion for women facuity. Review of Higher Education 17 (3): 259–270.Google Scholar
  14. Finnegan, D. E. 1993. Segmentation in the academic labor market: Hiring cohorts in comprehensive universities. Journal of Higher Education 64 (6): 621–656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hensel, N. 1991. Realizing gender equality in higher education: The need to integrate work/family issues. Washington, D.C.: Association for the Study of Higher Education, ERIC Clearinghouse on Higher Education.Google Scholar
  16. Johnsrud, L. K., and M. Wunsch. 1991. Barriers to success in academic life: Perceptions of faculty women in a colleague pairing program. ASHE Annual Meeting Paper. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 399 312.Google Scholar
  17. National Research Council. 1977, 1987, 1996. Summary reports: Doctorate recipients from U.S. universities. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  18. Nettles, M. T., and L. W. Perna. 1995. Sex and race differences in faculty salaries, tenure, rank, and productivity: Why, on average, do women, African Americans, and Hispanics have lower salaries, tenure, and rank? ASHE Annual Meeting Paper. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 391 402.Google Scholar
  19. Olsen, D. 1991. Women and minority faculty job satisfaction: A structural model examining the effect of professional role interests. ASHE Annual Meeting Paper. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 339 323.Google Scholar
  20. Parson, L. A. 1991. The campus climate for women faculty at a public university. Initiatives 54 (1): 19–27.Google Scholar
  21. Robertson, L. J., and J. P. Bean. 1997. Job satisfaction for women faculty members in a predominantly female discipline. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, Ill. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 406895.Google Scholar
  22. Rossi, A. S., and A. Calderwood, eds. 1973. Academic women on the move, New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  23. Sandler, B. R 1986. The campus climate revisited: Chilly for women faculty, administrators, and graduate students. Association of American Colleges, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  24. -. 1991. Women faculty at work in the classroom, or, why it still hurts to be a woman in labor. Communication Education 40 (1): 6–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. -. 1992. Success and survival strategies for women faculty members. Association of American Colleges, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  26. Sax, L. J., et al. 1996. The American college teacher: National norms for the 1995–96 HERI faculty survey. Los Angeles: Higher Education Research Institute, UCLA.Google Scholar
  27. Simeone, A. 1987. Academic women: Working towards equality. South Hadley, Mass.: Bergin and Garvey.Google Scholar
  28. Strober, M. H., et al. 1993. Report of the provost’s committee on the recruitment and retention of women faculty. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 366 269.Google Scholar
  29. Tack, M. W., and C. L. Patitu. 1992. Faculty job satisfaction: Women and minorities in peril. ERIC Clearinghouse on Higher Education, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  30. Vetter, B. M., and E. L. Babco. 1986. Professional women and minorities, Commission on Professionals in Science and Technology. Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  31. Wenzel, S. A., and C. Hollenshead. 1994. Tenured women faculty: Reasons for leaving one research university. ASHE Annual Meeting Paper. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 375 713.Google Scholar
  32. West, M. S. 1995. Women faculty: Frozen in time. Academe 81 (4): 26–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Wunsch, M. A. 1994. Giving structure to experience: Mentoring strategies for women faculty. Initiatives 56 (1): 1–10.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Helen S. Astin
  • Christine M. Cress

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations