Advertisement

Introduction

  • Lilli S. Hornig
Chapter
  • 66 Downloads
Part of the Innovations in Science Education and Technology book series (ISET, volume 15)

Abstract

The last thirty years have seen enormous changes in the status of women in research universities. Barely tolerated in many such institutions even as students at the beginning of the period, women were essentially absent from the ranks of ftill professors, and were only small fractions of all faculty ranks. In 1977 in chemistry departments, for example, women made up just 1.9 percent of all faculty ranks in the top 25 universities (ordered by research and development expenditures) and in mathematics that pro- portion was 2.7 percent (National Academy of Sciences 1979:68). The Women’s Caucus of the American Physical Society published what came to be known as the Zeros Table, listing the great majority of research departments that had no women faculty at all. A chemistry department chairman in a flagship state imiversity declared that “over my dead body” would there ever be a tenured woman in his department. Just over twenty years later there are women on the permanent as well as the probationary faculties of every imiversity, in the arts, sciences, and humanities, in medical, law, and engineering schools.

Keywords

Faculty Rank Professional School American Physical Society Woman Faculty Woman Student 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ahem, Nancy C., and Elizabeth L. Scott. 1981. Career outcomes in a matched sample of men and women Ph.D.s. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  2. Babco, Eleanor L. 2000. Professional women and minorities. Washington, D.C.: Commission on Professionals in Science and Technology.Google Scholar
  3. Carnegie Council on Policy Studies in Higher Education. 1975. Making affirmative action work in higher education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  4. Chamberlain, Mariam K., ed. 1988. Women in academe: Progress and prospects. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  5. Evangelauf, Jean. 1994. A new Carnegie classification. The Chronicle of Higher Education XL (April 6).Google Scholar
  6. Harris, Ann Sutherland. 1970. The second sex in academe. AAUPBulletin 56 3): 283–295.Google Scholar
  7. Haven, Elizabeth W., and Dwight H. Horch. 1972. How college students finance their education. New York: College Entrance Examination Board.Google Scholar
  8. Hornig, Lilli S. 1984. Women in science and engineering: Why so few? Technology Review 87 (Nov/Dec): 30–41.Google Scholar
  9. Kennedy, Donald. 1997. Academic duty, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Lawler, Andrew. 2001. College heads pledge to remove barriers. Science 291 (February): 806.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Leap, Terry L. 1993. Tenure, discrimination, and the courts. Ithaca, N.Y.: ILR Press.Google Scholar
  12. Lester, Richard A. 1974. Antibias regulation of universities: Faculty problems and their solutions. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  13. Long, Janice, 2001. Gender equity: Promises made. Chemical and Engineering News 79 (February 5): 8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. 1999. A study on the status of women faculty in science at MIT. Cambridge, Mass.: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
  15. McGuigan, Dorothy Gies. 1970. A dangerous experiment: 100 years of women at the University of Michigan. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.Google Scholar
  16. Nadis, Steve. 2001. Top research universities face up to gender bias. Nature 409 (8 February): 653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. National Academy of Sciences, Committee on the Education and Employment of Women in Science and Engineering. 1979. Climbing the academic ladder: Doctoral women scientists in academe. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  18. Olson, Keith W. 1974. The G.I. Bill, the veterans, and the colleges. Lexington: University Press of Kentucky.Google Scholar
  19. Sanderson, Allen R., et al. 1999. Doctorate recipients from United States universities: Summary report 1998. Chicago: National Opinion Research Center at the University of Chicago.Google Scholar
  20. Special Subcommittee on Education, Committee on Education and Labor, House of Representatives, 93rd Congress, Second Session. 1975. Hearings: Civil rights obligations. Washington D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  21. Tuckman, Howard, Susan Coyle, and Yupin Bae. 1990. On time to the doctorate: A study of the increased time to complete doctorates in science and engineering. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lilli S. Hornig

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations