Abstract
Our diagnostic possibilities in examination of orbital lesions have been considerably enlarged by ultrasonography and computerized tomography. In a high percentage of those of our patients who have been examined with both methods, retrobulbar lesions could be verified. In a number of cases, however, we have been misled by the outcome of one of these methods. This may be illustrated by the following clinical examples.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1978 Dr. W Junk by Publishers
About this paper
Cite this paper
Nover, A., Schmitt, J. (1978). Misleading Findings Obtained by Ultrasonography and Computerized Tomography. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium on Orbital Disorders Amsterdam, September 5–7, 1977. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-9978-7_24
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-9978-7_24
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-009-9980-0
Online ISBN: 978-94-009-9978-7
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive