Abstract
An age may often be defined by the great new ideas that sift into all the varied crevices of thought of a given civilization. Regardless of where these ideas may have their start, whether in the natural or the social sciences or in the humanistic disciplines, it is testimony to their compelling strength that as these ideas are exposed to ever widening areas of knowledge, the older ways of thinking give way to the new. Yet as these new ideas leave their original grounds and move into strange fields seldom do they retain their pristine meaning. Each succeeding host discipline kneads and molds them to its own special purposes. But once again the power of the new ideas may be such that regardless of these shifts in meaning, some part of the original sense is retained. This part succeeds in transforming the way men think about their traditional problems and gives birth to whole generations of new ones. Newtonian mechanics and Darwinian evolution were two such universal solvents of traditional ways of thinking about nature, both physical and social.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
F. E. Emery (ed.), Systems Thinking, Penguin Books, London, 1969.
See D. Easton, The Political System, Knopf, New York, 1971, 2nd edition.
See A. Ranney (ed.), Political Science and Public Policy, Markham, Chicago, 1969;T. R. Dye, Politics, Economics and the Public: Policy Outcomes in the American States, Rand McNally, Chicago, 1966;and I. Sharkansky (ed.), Policy Analysis in Political Science, Markham, Chicago, 1970.
See A. Ranney (ed.), Political Science and Public Policy, Markham, Chicago, 1969;T. R. Dye, Politics, Economics and the Public: Policy Outcomes in the American States, Rand McNally, Chicago, 1966;and I. Sharkansky (ed.), Policy Analysis in Political Science, Markham, Chicago, 1970.
See A. Ranney (ed.), Political Science and Public Policy, Markham, Chicago, 1969;T. R. Dye, Politics, Economics and the Public: Policy Outcomes in the American States, Rand McNally, Chicago, 1966;and I. Sharkansky (ed.), Policy Analysis in Political Science, Markham, Chicago, 1970.
D. Easton, ‘The New Revolution in Political Science’ American Political Science Review 63 (1969), 1051–1061, Presidential Address to American Political Science Association 65th Annual Meeting, September 2–6,1969, New York City.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1979 D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, Holland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Easton, D. (1979). Systems Analysis in Politics and its Critics. In: Johnson, H.J., Leach, J.J., Muehlmann, R.G. (eds) Revolutions, Systems and Theories. Theory and Decision Library, vol 19. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-9894-0_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-9894-0_3
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-009-9896-4
Online ISBN: 978-94-009-9894-0
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive