Abstract
The biggest advance in the theory of nonlinear equations in recent years has been the invention of the so-called inverse scattering method by Gardner et al. [1] in 1967, who used it to solve the initial value problem for the Korteweg-de Vries [2] equation. The method was systematized by Lax [3] in 1968 and it was given definitive respectability by Zacharov and Shabat [4] in 1971 when they solved the Schröding er equation with a cubic nonlinearity. By now, a large number of equations can be solved this way [5]. This method, in the language of Lax [3], is the following: Given an evolution equation, say, of the form
one finds firstly operators L and B such that Equation (1.1) is equivalent to the relation
In this case the spectrum of L does not depend on time and one says that the flow of L is isospectral. Secondly, one tries to associate a scattering problem with the operator L (which acts, for instance, on a Hilbert space). This typically restricts the type of asymptotic behavior allowed on u. Finally, the direct and inverse scattering problems associated with L must be solved.
Lectures given at NATO Advanced Study Institute on Nonlinear. Equations in Physics and Mathematics, Istanbul, August 1977.
Supported in part by the NSF Grant No. GP-40768X.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
C. S. Gardner, J. Green, M. Kruskal and R. Miura, Phys. Rev. Lett. 19, 1095 (1967).
D. J. Korteweg and G. de Vries, Phil. Mag. 39, 422 (1895).
P. L. Lax, Commun. Pure and Appl. Math., 21, 467 (1968).
V. E. Zacharov and A. B. Shabat, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 61, 118 (1971) [Soy. Physics TETP 34, 62 (1972)].
See the article by R. Bullough in these Proceedings.
H. D. Wahlquist and F. B. Estabrook, T. Math. Phys. 16., 1 (1975) and 17, 1293 (1976). See also their “Prolongation Structures, Connection Theory and Backlund Transformation,” to be published in the Proceedings of the International Symposium of Nonlinear Evolution Equations Solvable via the Inverse Scattering Transformation, Accademia dei Lincei, Rome, June 15–18, 1977, F. Calogero, Ed., and references therein. J. Corones and D. Levermore, Courant Institute Report (unpublished). J. Corones, “Using Pseudopotentials,”Iowa State Report (unpublished).
G. E. Lamb, Jr., Phys. Rev. Lett. 37, 235 (1976) and I. Math. Phys. 18, 1654 (1977).
F. Lund and T. Regge, Phys. Rev. D14, 1524 (1976); F. Lund, Phys. Rev. D15, 1540 (1977); Phys. Rev. Lett. 38, 1175 (1977); “Classically Solvable Field Theory Model,”Princeton Preprint, 1977, Ann. Phys. (to be published).
L. Bianchi, Lezioni di Geometria Diferenziale ( Spoerri, Pisa, 1922 ).
M. Ablowitz, D. J. Kaup, A. C. Newell and H. Segur, Phys. Rev. Lett. 30, 1262 (1973) and Stud. Appl. Math. 53, 249 (1974); L. A. Takhtadjan, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 66 (1974) [Sov. Phvs. JETP 39, 228 (1974)]; V. E. Zakharov, L. A. Takhtadzhan and L. D. Faddeev, Dokl. Akad. Nauk. SSSR 219, 1334 (1974) [Sov. Phvs. Dikl. 19, 824 (1975)]; L. A. Takhtadzhan and L. D. Faddeev, Teor. Mat. Fiz. 21, 160 (1974).
These results are standard. See, for example, J. J. Stoker, Differential Geometry, Wiley, New York-London-Sidney- Toronto, 1969, andM. Spivak, A Comprehensive Introduction to Differential Geometry, Publish or Perish, Boston, 1975.
A. Neveu and N. Papanicolaou, “Integrability of the Classical (www)2 and (ii4Ji)22 (wiw5wi)22 Interactions,”Commun. Math. Phys. 58, 31 (1978).
Y. Nambu and G. Jona-Lasinio, Phys. Rev. 122 , 345 (1961).
D. J. Gross and A. Neveu, Phys. Rev. D14, 3235 (1974).
R. F. Dashen, B. Hasslacher and A. Neveu, Phys. Rev. D12, 2443 (1975).
S. S. Shei, Phys. Rev. D14, 535 (1976).
This equation has also been considered by B. S. Getmanov, Pis’ma Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 2JL, 132 (1977) [JETP Lett. 25, 119 (1977)].
K. Pohlmeyer, Commun. Math. Phys. 46, 207 (1976).
M. Gell-Mann and M. Lévy, Nuovo Cim. 16, 705 (1960); F. Gürsey, Nuovo Cim. 16 , 230 (1960); S. Weinberg, Phys. Rev. 166, 1568 (1968).
S. Weinberg, 1976 Erice Lecture Notes (unpublished) and references therein.
A. A. BelavinandA. M. Polyakov, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. Pis’ma Red. 22, 503 (1975), [TE TP Lett. 22, 245 (1975)].
L. P. Eisenhart, Riemannian Geometry, Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1925, Chapter V.
P. L. Tchebychef,“Sur la Coupure des Vêtements,” Oeuvres, Bd. II, S. 708, 1878.
This problem has been independently considered by M. Jaulent as arising from a Schröding er equation with a velocity-dependent potential. See Jaulent’s contribution to these Proceedings.
F. Prats and J. Toll, Phys. Rev. 113, 363 (1959).
D. J. Kaup, Prog. Theor. Phys. 54, 396 (1975).
V. E. Zacharov and L. D. Faddeev, Func. Anal, and Its Applic. 5, 280 (1972).
B. Julia and F. Lund, in preparation.
P. A. M. Dirac, Lectures in Quantum Mechanics, Yeshiva University, New York, 1964. See also A. J. Hanson, T. Regge and C. Teitelboim, Constrained Hamiltonian Systems, Accademia dei Lincei, Rome, 1976.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1978 D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, Holland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Lund, F. (1978). Solitons and Geometry. In: Barut, A.O. (eds) Nonlinear Equations in Physics and Mathematics. NATO Advanced Study Institutes Series, vol 40. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-9891-9_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-9891-9_6
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-009-9893-3
Online ISBN: 978-94-009-9891-9
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive