Advertisement

Analyticity and Apriority

  • Adam Nowaczyk
Part of the Synthese Library book series (SYLI, volume 119)

Abstract

It is common knowledge that the definition by which I. Kant introduced the new term ‘analytic judgement’ into the language of philosophy does not perform its task well.1 It has been noticed that it does not even render the intentions of its author — intentions which are revealed by other formulations in Kant’s writings.2 They are clear enough to be described by a more or less precise definition. One of the earliest definitions of the term ‘analytic statement’3 was formulated by Gottlob Frege, precisely in order to render Kànt’s intentions. Frege’s definition,4 which we shall consider a pertinent description of the Kantian concept of analyticity, states that a statement is analytic in character if it can be proved exclusively by reference to general laws of logic and to definitions.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    K. Ajdukiewicz, Język i poznanie (Language and Cognition), Vol. 1-1960, Vol. 2-1965.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    K. Ajdukiewicz, ‘Le problème du fondement des propositions analytiques’, Studia Logica, Vol. VIII, 1958.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    K. Ajdukiewicz, ‘The Axiomatic Systems from the Methodological Point of View’, Studia Logica, Vol. IX, 1960.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    R. Carnap, Meaning and Necessity, Chicago 1947.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    G. Frege, The Foundation of Arithmetic, Oxford 1950.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    H.P. Grice and P.F. Strawson, ‘In Defense of Dogma’, in: R.R. Ammerman (ed.), Classics of Analytic Philosophy, McGraw-Hill, 1965.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    Th. Hobbes, The Elements of Philosophy, London 1956.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    I. Kant, Critique of Pure Reason translated by J.M.D. Meiklejohn, London-Toronto 1934.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    W. Kneale, ‘Are Necessary Truths True by Convention?’ Aristotelian Society Proceedings, 1947 (Supplement).Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    W. Kneale and M. Kneale, The Development of Logic, Oxford 1962.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    M. Kokoszyéska, ‘O dwojakim rozumieniu uzasadnienia dedukcyjnego’ (Two Concepts of Deductive Justification), Studia Logica, Vol. XIII, 1962.Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    M. Kokoszyéska, ‘O dyrektywach inferencji’ (On the Rules of Inference), in: Rozprawy logiczne (Papers on Logic), 1964.Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    C.I. Lewis, An Analysis of Knowledge and Valuation, La Salle, Illinois 1964.Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    A. Pap,‘Necessary Propositions and Linguistic Rules’, Archivio di Filosofia, Rome 1955.Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    A. Pap, Semantic and Necessary Truth, Yale Univ. Press, 1958.Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    M. Przeięcki, ‘O pojęciu zdania analitycznego’ (On the Notion of an Analytic Sentence), Studia Logica, Vol. XIV, 1963.Google Scholar
  17. [17]
    W.V.O. Quine, ‘Two Dogmas of Empiricism’, in: From a Logical Point of View, Harvard Univ. Press, 1953.Google Scholar
  18. [18]
    B. Stanosz, ‘Formalne teorie zakresu i treści wyrażeé’ (Formal Theories of Extension and Intension of Expressions), Studia Logica, Vol. XV, 1964.Google Scholar
  19. [19]
    R. Suszko, ‘Logika formalna a niektóre zagadnienia teorii poznania’ (Formal Logic and Selected Issues in Epistemology), Myàl Filozoficzna, 1956.Google Scholar
  20. [20]
    M.G. White, ‘The Analytic and the Synthetic: An Untenable Dualism’, in: L. Linsky (ed.), Semantics and the Philosophy of Language, Univ. of Illinois Press, 1952.Google Scholar
  21. [21]
    R. Wójcicki, ‘Analityczne komponenty definicji arbitralnych’ (Analytic Components of Arbitrary Definitions), Studia Logica, Vol. XIV, 1963.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© PWN — Polish Scientific Publishers — Warszawa 1979

Authors and Affiliations

  • Adam Nowaczyk

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations