Skip to main content

Languages and Theories Adequate to the Ontology of the Language of Science

  • Chapter
Semiotics in Poland 1984–1969

Part of the book series: Synthese Library ((SYLI,volume 119))

  • 154 Accesses

Abstract

Philosophers of science differ in their views concerning the subject matter of science, that is, what theorems are about and to what they refer. These problems are of an ontological nature. Some kind of ontology underlies every language of sciences. This discipline is concerned with “the general principles of being”, with what exists, the nature of what exists, types of entities, etc. The ontology of the language of science manifests itself in that language, if only in the syntax of that language, in the kinds of expressions used in that language and in the syntactic categories assigned to them. The idea that language determines an ontology has been emphasized in Poland by Roman Suszko.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. By a scientific term we mean here a simple expression in the language of a given discipline, which is neither a variable, nor a punctuation mark, nor a bracket. By a scientific term in the narrower sense of the word we mean an extra-logical constant in the language of that discipline.

    Google Scholar 

  2. In the terminology adopted here’ symbolizes’ means the same as ‘denotes’. Only constant expressions’ symbolize’ (denote); variable expressions (variables) ‘represent’.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Our own interpretation of this term agrees with that of Tarski, as formulated in his book Undecidable Theories, Amsterdam 1953.

    Google Scholar 

  4. To avoid misunderstandings let us remind the reader that the symbol Σ used in the formula above is the operator which denotes the arithmetical sum of a finite sequence of numbers

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chap. VI (a description of Peano’s adequate arithmetic) has been omitted. (Ed.)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1979 PWN — Polish Scientific Publishers — Warszawa

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Stonert, H. (1979). Languages and Theories Adequate to the Ontology of the Language of Science. In: Pelc, J. (eds) Semiotics in Poland 1984–1969. Synthese Library, vol 119. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-9777-6_28

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-9777-6_28

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-009-9779-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-9777-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics