Syntactic Domains for Semantic Rules

  • Tanya Reinhart
Part of the Synthese Language Library book series (SLAP, volume 4)


My concern in this paper is to characterize certain systematic ways in which the semantic interpretation of English sentences is constrained by the syntactic properties of the surface forms of such sentences.


Linear Order Wide Scope Semantic Interpretation Domain Relation Prepositional Phrase 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Chomsky, N. (1965), Aspects of the Theory of Syntax, M.I.T. Press.Google Scholar
  2. Chomsky, N. (1973, ‘Conditions on Transformations’, in Anderson and Kiparsky (eds.), A Festschrift for Morris Halle, Holt, Reinhart and Winston.Google Scholar
  3. Gabbay, D. M. and Moravcsik, J. M. (1974), ‘Branching Quantifiers, English, and Montague Grammar’, Theoretical Linguistics, Vol. 1, No. 1/2.Google Scholar
  4. Ioup, G. (1975), The Treatment of Quantifier Scope in Transformational Grammar, (Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation), Cuny, New York.Google Scholar
  5. Jackendoff, R. (1972), Semantics in Generative Grammar, M.I.T. Press.Google Scholar
  6. Jackendoff, R. (1975), ‘On Belief-Contexts’, Linguistic Inquiry, Vol. 6, No. 1.Google Scholar
  7. Keenan, E. (1974), ‘The Functional Principle: Generalizing the Notion of “subject of”’, in M. LaGaly, R. Fox and A. Bruck (eds.), Papers from the Tenth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
  8. Keenan, E. (1976), ‘Remarkable Subjects in Malagasy’, in C. N. Li (ed.), Subject and Topic, Academic Press.Google Scholar
  9. Kuno, S. (1972, ‘Functional Sentence Perspective: A Case Study from Japanese and English’, Linguistic Inquiry, Vol. 3, No. 3.Google Scholar
  10. Lakoff, G. (1968), ‘Pronouns and Reference’, Indiana Club Mimeograph.Google Scholar
  11. Lakoff, G. (1971), ‘On Generative Semantics’, in D. A. Steinberg & L. A. Jakobovits (eds.), Semantics, Cambridge, The University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Langacker, R. (1966), ‘On Pronominalization and the Chain of Command’ in Reibel and Schane (eds.), Modern Studies in English, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.Google Scholar
  13. Lasnik, H. (1976), ‘Remarks on Coreference’, Linguistic Analysis, Vol. 2, No. 1.Google Scholar
  14. Postal, P. (1971), Cross over Phenomena, Holt, Reinhart and Winston.Google Scholar
  15. Reinhart, T. (1976), The Syntactic Domain of Anaphora, Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, M.I.T.Google Scholar
  16. Ross, J. R. (1967), Constraints on Variables in Syntax, Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, M.I.T.Google Scholar
  17. Ross, J. R. (1973), ‘Nearer to Vee’, mimeographed handout, M.I.T.Google Scholar
  18. Sag, Ivan (1976), Deletion and Logical Form, Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, M.I.T.Google Scholar
  19. Wasow, T. (1972), Anaphoric Relations in English, Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, M.I.T.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, Holland 1978

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tanya Reinhart
    • 1
  1. 1.University of Tel AvivIsrael

Personalised recommendations