Abstract
Composition studies were completed using 49 steers representing variations in muscularity that included double muscled cattle. Results indicated that non-muscular cattle were fatter than anticipated when evaluated subjectively, and the reverse was true for muscular cattle. Muscular cattle contained from 2 to 7% more fat-free muscle and this was attributed to higher muscle-bone ratios; however, fatness was the dominating variable in determining ultimate composition. The proportionate contributions of each muscle to total muscle mass and each bone to total skeletal mass was nearly constant for all cattle, and this was also true for body parts (holding fat content and weight constant). Wizen fat content and live empty body weight were held constant, all cattle converted equal quantities of feed to fat-free muscle. The combination of fat depth, longissimus area and marbling content provided a useful combination of variables to predict quantity of fat-free muscle. Muscular cattle had higher dressing yields which were attributed to their possessing proportionately smaller body cavities. Fatter cattle did not have higher dressing yields when live weight and muscularity were held constant because it appeared that increased quantities of mesentery fat compensated on a proportional basis for increased quantities of carcass fat. One double muscled steer possessed the biological capacity to deposit excess quantities of fat when time on feed was unlimited.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Berg, R.T. and Butterfield, R.M. 1976. New concepts of cattle growth. Sydney University Press, Sydney, Australia, p. 29, 178.
BrÉnnäng, E. 1966. Studies on monozygous twins. XVIII. The effect of castration and age of castration on the growth rate, feed conversion and carcass traits of Swedish red and white cattle. Part 1. Lantbrukshogskolans Annaler 32: 329–415.
Charles, D.D. and Johnson, E.R. 19761. Breed differences in amount and distribution of bovine carcass dissectible fat. J. Anim. Sci. 42(2): 332–341.
Charles, D.D. and Johnson, E.R. 19762. Muscle weight distribution in four breeds of cattle with reference to individual muscles, anatomical groups and wholesale cuts. J. Agric. Sci. 86: 435–442.
de Boer, H. 1969. Unpublished data. Zeist, The Netherlands.
Ellenberger, H.B., Newlander, J.A., and Jones, C.H. 1950. Composition of the bodies of dairy cattle. Vermont Agr. Exp. Sta. Bul. 558.
Fahey, T.J., Schaefer, D.M., Kauffman, R.G., Epley, R.J., Gould, P.F., Romans, J.R., Smith, G.C. and Topel, D.G. 1977. A comparison of practical methods to estimate pork carcass composition. J. Anim. Sci. 44(1): 8–17.
Hedrick, H.B., 1968. Bovine growth and composition. Res. Bul. 928, U. of Missouri, College of Agric., Agric. Exp. Sta., Columbia, MO.
Johnson, E.R., Butterfield, R.M. and Pryor, W.J. 1972. Studies of fat distribution in the bovine carcass 1. The partition of fatty tissues between depots. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 23: 381–388.
Kauffman, R.G. 1971. Variation in gross composition of meat animals. Proc. 24th Recip. Meat Conf., Am. Meat Sci. Assn., Lexington, KY. 292–303.
Kauffman, R.G., Grummer, R.H., Smith, R.E., Long, R.A. and Shook, G. 1973. Does live-animal and carcass shape influence gross composition? J. Anim. Sci. 37(5): 1112–1119.
Kauffman, R.G., Van Es, M.D. and Long, R.A. 1976. Bovine compositional interrelationships. J. Anim. Sci. 43(1): 102–107.
Kauffman, R.G., Van Es, M.D. and Long, R.A. 1977. Bovine muscularity its relationship to feed efficiency. J. Anim. Sci. 44(3): 368–373.
Kauffman, R.G., Van Es, M.E., Long, R.A. and Schaefer, D.M. 1975. Marbling: its use in predicting beef carcass composition. J. Anim. Sci. 40(2): 235–241.
Lewis, R.W. 1977. Some objective studies related to beef carcass composition. Ph. D. Thesis. University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI.
Novakofski, J.E. and Kauffman, R.G. 1977. Unpublished data. Dept. Meat and Anim. Sci. University of Wisconsin. Madison, WI.
Preston, R.L. 1971. Effects of nutrition on the body composition of cattle and sheep. Georgia Nutrition Conference, University of GA, Athens. 26–41.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1978 Martinus Nijhoff - The Hague/Boston/London
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kauffman, R.G. (1978). Bovine Compositional Interrelationships. In: De Boer, H., Martin, J. (eds) Patterns of Growth and Development in Cattle. Current Topics in Veterinary Medicine, vol 2. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-9756-1_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-9756-1_2
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-009-9758-5
Online ISBN: 978-94-009-9756-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive