Electrocardiographic Patterns in Sick Sinus Syndrome

  • R. Sutton
  • P. Barrett
  • R. Emanuel


The first year’s experience of a new London pacemaker clinic shows a high incidence of sick sinus syndrome- 17 or 33% of 51 new patients. The diagnosis was made in 15 patients by documenting sinoatrial block with delayed escape mechanism either on routine electrocardiography or on 24 hour Holter monitoring ( 1 ). 2 patients showed persistent sinus bradycardia at less than 60 beats per minute and abnormal sinus node behaviour with intravenous atropine and isoprenaline (1) and after rapid atrial pacing (2). Clinically 14 of these patients presented with syncope as the primary symptom and 3 with dyspnoea. Of the important additional symptoms of sick sinus syndrome 5 had paroxysmal tachycardias and 3 had angina pectoris. Ventricular pacing is generally the chosen mode of therapy in patients with sick sinus syndrome. It is noteworthy that in only 12 of 14 syncopal patients were the attacks abolished by ventricular pacing. Both of the other patients were subsequently converted to atrial pacing with abolition of the attacks, the patients confirming dependance on atrial systole. Its persistent lack in ventricular pacing appeared to be due to retrograde atrial activation via the atrio-ventricular node. 2 of 3 dyspnoeic patients were given relief by ventricular pacing. The other patient required digitalis and diuretics. In contrast paroxysmal tachycardias were not well suppressed by pacing alone and 4 of 5 required drug therapy also. Angina pectoris required drug therapy in all patients.


Ventricular Pace Lead Electrocardiogram Sick Sinus Syndrome Rapid Atrial Pace Syncopic Patient 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Ferrer M.I., The Sick Sinus Syndrome. Circulation 47, 635 (1973).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mandel W., Hayakawa H., Danzig R., Marcus H.S., Evaluation of sino-atrial function in man by overdrive suppression. Circulation 44, 59 (1971).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Rosen K.M., Loeb H.S., Sinno M.Z., Rahimtoola S.H., Gunnar R.M., Cardiac conduction in patients with symptomatic sinus node disease. Circulation 43, 836 (1971).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Harris C.L., Baldwin B.J., Permanent atrial paralysis. J. Electrocardiology 9, 81 (1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Allensworth D.C., Rice G.J., Lowe G.W., Persistent atrial standstill in a family with myocardial disease. Amer. J. Med. 47, 775 (1969).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Harrison W.H., Derrick J.C., Atrial Standstill: A review and presentation of two new cases of familial and unusual nature with reference to epicardial pacing in one. Angiology 20, 610 (1969).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Williams D.O., Jones E.L., Nagle R.E., Smith B.S., Familial atrial cardiomyopathy with heart block. Quat. J. Med. 61, 491 (1972).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bloomfield D.A., Sinclair-Smith B.C., Persistent atrial standstill. Amer. J. Med. 39, 335 (1965).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Narula O.S., Atrio-ventricular conduction defects in patients with sinus bradycardia. Analysis by His Bundle recordings. Circulation 44, 1096 (1971).PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Martinus Nijhoff Publishers by, The Hague 1978

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. Sutton
  • P. Barrett
  • R. Emanuel

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations