Abstract
The social sciences today are again in a period of self-scrutiny. The trust in the self-sustaining virtues of scientific methodology — so prevalent in the postwar era — is a matter of the past; evicted from the position of undisputed sovereign, positive science finds itself in the more modest role of a partisan perspective competing for attention and credibility in the professional community. Among alternative views, phenomenology in recent years had gained particular prominence in debates on the premises and functions of social inquiry. As Maurice Natanson has observed: phenomenology — broadly “in the ascendancy” in English-speaking countries — represents today “a distinctive voice in the conversation of social scientists.”1 The argument advanced by phenomenologists in this conversation is by no means one-dimensional or univocal; yet (as it seems to me), it is not impossible to discern a major thrust or common inflection. Broadly speaking, this thrust involves a stress on, and special attentiveness to, the peculiar features or distinctive traits of social phenomena as compared to purely natural phenomena; as a corollary of such attentiveness, the social scientist is commonly assumed to be less rigidly detached from his subject matter than the natural scientist and to be able to grasp not only the external sequence but also the intrinsic significance of social events.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Maurice Natanson, ed., Phenomenology and the Social Sciences, vol. I (Evanston: Northwestern University Press, I973), pp. XV, 4. For additional evidence of the impact of phenomenology compare, e.g., George Psathas, ed., Phenomenological Sociology: Issues and Applications (New York: Wiley Press, I973); John O’Neill, Sociology as a Skin Trade (New York: Harper and Row, I972), and several essays in Marvin Surkin and Alan Wolfe, eds., An End to Political Science: The Caucus Papers (New York: Basic Books, I970).
Alfred Schutz, “Concept and Theory Formation in the Social Sciences,” in Maurice Natanson, ed., Philoso Phy of the Social Sciences: A Reader (New York: Random House, 1963), pp. 240, 245.
Richard S. Rudner, Philosophy of Social Science (Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall, 1966), pp. 72–73, 79–80.
Ernest Nagel, The Structure of Science: Problems in the Logic of Scientific Explanation (New York: Harcourt, Brace and World, 1961), PP. 474–477, 479–480,484. Compare also his comment in another context: “The imputation of emotions, attitudes, and purposes as an explanation of overt behavior is a two-fold hypothesis; it is not a self-certifying one, and evidence for it must be supplied in accordance with customary canons of empirical inquiry.” See “Problems of Concept and Theory Formation in the Social Sciences,” in Natanson, ed.,. PhilosoPhy of the Social Sciences: A Reader, pp. r89–209.
See Alan C. Isaak, Scope and Methods of Political Science: An Introduction to the Methodology of Political Inquiry (Homewood, Ill.: Dorsey Press, 1969), pp. 105–106, 119–120, 149, 152; also Hans Reichenbach, The Rise of Scientific PhilosoPhy (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1951), p. 231.
See F. A. Hayek, The Counter-Revolution of Science (Glencoe, Ill.: Free Press, 1952);
Robert M. MacIver, Social Causation (New York: Ginn and Company, 1942); Robert Brown, Explanation in Social Science (Chicago: Aldine Publishing Co., 1963); and W.G. Runcinlan, Social Science and Political Theory (Cambridge: At the University Press, 1963).
Alfred Schutz, The Phenomenology of the Social World, trans. George Walsh and Frederick Lohnert (Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1967).
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1978 Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, Netherlands
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Dallmayr, F.R. (1978). Genesis and Validation of Social Knowledge: Lessons from Merleau-Ponty. In: Bien, J. (eds) Phenomenology and The Social Science: A Dialogue. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-9693-9_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-9693-9_5
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-247-2040-8
Online ISBN: 978-94-009-9693-9
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive