Abstract
I have become increasingly convinced that alongside the more well-known themes of Husserlian phenomenology, such as intentionality or the Lebenswelt, is another which is of equal significance, even though its treatment by Husserl is troublesome, and not finally thought through.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Edmund Husserl, The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology, trans. David Carr (Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1970), pp. 159–60.
Cf. Aron Gurwitsch, The Field of Consciousness (Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press, zd impression, 1964), pp. 85–154.
Edmund Husserl, Ideen zu einer reinen Phiinomenologie und phiinomenologischen Philosophie, Erstes Buch, Hrsg. Walter Biemel, Husserliana Band Ill. (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1950), § 70.
Ludwig Landgrebe, “Das Problem der phanomenologischen Psychologie bei Husserl,” Proceedings of the XIVth International Congress of PhilosoPhy, Volume II. (Vienna: Herder and Co, 1968), pp. 151–63.
James Agee, Let Us Now Praise Famous Men (New York: Houghton Mifflin Company, 1960).
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1978 Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, Netherlands
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Zaner, R.M. (1978). Eidos and Science. In: Bien, J. (eds) Phenomenology and The Social Science: A Dialogue. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-9693-9_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-9693-9_1
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-247-2040-8
Online ISBN: 978-94-009-9693-9
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive