Abstract
In this first chapter the theme of intentionality in the early Husserl will be discussed. As Husserl himself pointed out later in Ideen I, “The name of the problem that encompasses all of phenomenology is intentionality.”1 Because of the central place which intentionality already occupied in the thought of the early Husserl, and because of the universal significance which it was later to assume, an analysis of this theme is an excellent way to get into the genesis of phenomenology. I will discuss in turn the intentional relation of consciousness to its objects, the mode of being of intentional objects, and the relation between these objects and acts of consciousness.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Id I 303.
PA 71 note 3.
PA 74 note 1.
PES (edition Kraus) I, 137.
E. Utitz, ‘Franz Brentano,’ 224.
USE 16ff; Kategorienlehre 222, 244, 259, 282f.
See, for example, Spiegelberg, “as far as I can make out, this characterization is completely original with Brentano” (op. cit. 41). Husserl too honours Brentano as the discoverer of the intentional directedness of consciousness, LU II, 364fr; FTL 231, 217;
CM 79.
See below 18 and 45.
H.D. Simonin ‘La notion d’‘intentio’ dans l’oeuvre de S. Thomas d’Aquin’ 451ff. See also A. Hayen Lintentionnel dans la philosophie de Saint Thomas 194f, 244.
PES 148,140,142, 204f, 116, 119; II, XX; see also Oskar Kraus Franz Brentano 29; WE 17f.
PA 70, 72, 77.
PA 80.
PA 45, 49, 99f.
Id I 246 note 1.
LU II 282 note 1. On this question, see also a remark made by Kraus in PES vol. III, XXIII.
PA 45, 175.
PA 216.
PA 218, 239, 245, 249.
Entwurf 127, see also PSL 189.
Published in Philosophische Monatshefte. According to Entwurf 127 note 3, this article was finished in 1893.
PSL 174f.
PSL 186, compare title 168.
PSL 179, 187.
PSL 172, 175f.
See Kraus in the Introduction of PES II, XIIV, XL; A. Kastil ‘Die Philosophie Franz Brentano’s,’ 51, 55, 107, 165; ZBW 380 (E 36f).
LU II 384, see below 131.
Id I 256; LU III 21, see below 138.
See below 21.
PA 70, 78, note 1.
PA 17f, 38.
PA 22, 53, 112.
PA 20, 23.
PA 21, 24, 77, 83, see also 15, 82.
PA 18f; PSL 159; see also LU II 345, where this expression includes both acts and the material of sensation, i.e. contents.
PES I 112, 119, 196, 249f; Unters, z. Sinnespsychologie 96.
PA 15, 19, 38, 45, 74 note 1, 88, 175; BZ 14.
There were other reviews by: A. Elzas, W. Heinrich and Franz Hildebrand (see bibliography). The PA was also discussed by Jules Tannery in his book Science et Philosophie, 79–87.
LUI 169 note 1.
Frege op.cit. 316ff, 329.
See below 47.
See below 28.
Psl 169f, 178f: see also ZBW 141.
PSL 174 et passim.
PA 10,28,232,234,236; PSL 160,170,178. This has been criticized in the LU II, 394 note 1; III, 243 note 1.
LU II, 216 note 1, 217 note 1, 225, 228, 231, 234, 236, 239 note 1.
PA 14, 77; BZ 55.
PA 74, note 1,14,237. For the term ‘absolute content,’ see PA 37,40,56,139. Husserl also uses the term ‘absolute concretum’ PSL 165.
PA 83f, 151.
PSL 160f, 163, 171.
PA 77; PSL 173.
See below 85.
PA 11, 67, 79.
PA 79, see also 45.
PA 66, 91.
PA 79, 81,91.
LU II 282, note 1.
Id I 23, note 3, see also Entwurf 320f.
LU II 251ff. See below 83.
Farber, op.cit. 58.
W. Biemel, “Les phases décisives dans le développement de la philosophie de Husserl,” 39.
See below 72.
PA 11, 112, 179 note 1.
PA 11f, 33, 155, 165,225, 229.
PA 31, 33; 49, 9ff, 167.
VE 53. See below 78.
PA 167,31.
PA 279 note 1.
PA 92.
Frege Grundgesetze der Arithmetik, XIII, XVIII; PA 130 note I; LU I 169 note 1; see also below 280.
Compare L. Gilson, La psychologie descriptive selon Franz Brentano, 159ff.
PA 151ff.
PA 83.
PA 15,41,45,74,79.
PA 86, 158.
PA 61.
PA 84.
PA 9, 87, 147.
PA 94.
Cap. IX “Der Sinn der Zahlenaussage” 179ff; see also PA 45, 126, 162, 182, 202.
PA 182.
See above 24.
BZ 36f; PA 46.
PA 18, 45, 64; BZ 37; see also PA 167 for Kroman, who sees number as a part-content and thus a self-produced object.
Spiegelberg, The Phenomenological Movement. 103.
PA 36, 41, 92, 139.
See above 28.
PES II, XII.
See below 141 and 319.
Nachwort 156; Enc. Brit. Art, Husserliana IX 268; FTL 231.
PES I 13.
PES 166, 132; II 136; see also the notes of Kraus I, 268 note 7, 270 note 14, 271 note 18 and the introduction, LXXIX, LXXXIV.
PES I 129, 137; see also the polemic against Kant 223, 245, who also sees the inner phenomenon as “illusion” (Schein).
PES I 41ff, 50, 63, 61; Spiegelberg op.cit. 39.
PES I 179fr, 180, 189.
PES I 196, 198, 249; for the later Brentano, see PES III 6, 98.
PES I 140. For Brentano’s standpoint after the “crisis of immanence,” see PES II 136.
See above 15.
PSL 178 and 187.
LU II 354f.
LU II (ed. 1) 334 (compare ed. 2, 356); LU III 232f; ZBW 473 (E 162ff).
PA 66.
PA 58, compare 73.
PA 66; PSL 170f, see also LU III, 230 note 3.
PSL 181; PA 18.
PA 20, 34, 42, 61f, 66, 69, 79, 98, 168; PSL 181, 183.
PES I 122f, 134 note 1.
See below 164.
PES 138 and 151. For the term ‘physical phenomenon,’ see the critical remarks above 18 note 2.
PES I 13, 153, 184.
PES I 28, 87, no, 173, 196.
D. H.Th. Vollenhoven, Geschiedenis der wijsbegeerte I, 237; J. A. L. Taljaard, Franz Brentano as wijsgeer, 40.
PES I 30, 130f, 140, 172, 177f, 186, 250.
PES I 270 note 16; PES III, XXXI note 1.
See below 416.
See below 111.
C. Stumpf, ‘Zur Einteilung der Wissenschaften,’ 16, 20, 26. Compare H. Spiegelberg, The Phenomenological Movement I, 53, 56–61. See also Husserl about Stumpf, Id I 178.
H. Spiegelberg ‘Der Begriff der Intentionalität in der Scholastik, bei Brentano und bei Husserl’ 78, see above 18; Edith Stein ‘Husserls Phänomenologie und die Philosophie des hl. Thomas v. Aquino’ 335; A. Hayen, L’intentionnel dans la philosophie de St. Thomas, 1942, 18f, 253, 256.
Psychologie des Aristoteles 99f, see also 128.
PES I 37, 123, 176, 236; II, XVII.
Psychologie des Aristoteles 83, 85.
PES 13, no, 140, see also 45 and 173.
Rabeau, Species, Verbum, 73. “These intermediaries are not obstacles but instruments, and this is why St. Thomas does not hesitate to say that the conception has its basis immediately in the thing.”
Rabeau, op.cit. 287.
See A. Hayen, op.cit.287. 17 Rabeau, op.cit. 44, 49f.
PESI, 184, 196.
Landgrebe, Der Weg der Phänomenologie, 12.
See below 196.
PSL 178; see also above 21.
PSL 166.
See above 43.
LU I, 11.
LU III 228, 230 note 4.
LU II (ed. 1) 20 (compare 2nd ed. 20); see also PSL 166.
PES I 9, 27; WE 20. See also Husserl’s critical sketch of a positivistic metaphysics, PSW 298 and L. Gilson, Méthode et Métaphysique selon Franz Brentano, 62ff.
See below 55, 60.
Der Weg der Phänomenologie, 12.
See LU II 97 Anmerkung.
See, for example P. von Schiller, Aufgabe der Psychologie, 71. Husserl himself appears to have been well aware of the difference between the Scholastic doctrine of intentionality and that of Brentano. In any case, he speaks of Brentano’s “adaptation” (Umwertung) of the Scholastic conception of intentionality, PP. 247.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1978 Martinus Nijhoff Publishers bv, The Hague
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
De Boer, T. (1978). Acts, Contents, and the Relations between Them. In: The Development of Husserl’s Thought. Phaenomenologica, vol 76. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-9691-5_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-9691-5_1
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-247-2124-5
Online ISBN: 978-94-009-9691-5
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive