Skip to main content

Abstract

A new humanism thus developed, based on reason, imagination, and emotion. Thinkers had arrived at the conclusion that they could discover legislation for any area of life: the animal kingdom, music, morality, government. The vogue for encyclopaedias as collections of basic knowledge responded to this desire to re-evaluate the given in the world. A fresh view of these structural rules, especially a view colored by one’s sensitivity to beauty and to wrong, had two results in practice. Discrepancies between this theoretical knowledge and reality were revealed. And inventions of ideas and things were prompted. Again, encyclopaedias spoke to the need. They gathered in a convenient format improvements, whether in gardening, drama, or geometry, that had already been effected but were not widely known. Also, as contributors realized the difference between actuality and the ideal state suggested by the information they were outlining, they asked for reform.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Correspondance inédite de Condorcet et de Turgot: 1770–1779, ed. Charles Henry (Paris: Charavay, 1882), pp. 205–206.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bertrand defends the reliability of the Bible as a guide to salvation at least once. He says it is perfectly clear on all matters necessary for salvation, and that obscure passages contain nothing essential (“Hermeneutique”). Cf. also Haller’s profession of faith in his refutation of Voltaire: “Toute ma religion est renfermée dans l’Ecriture sainte, Se la conviction la plus inébranlable est tout mon savoir.” The letter is in Lettres de feu Mr. de Hatter… Voltaire , F.L. Koenig, trans. (Berne, 1780), p. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  3. M. Bouchard, De l’Humanisme à l’Encyclopédie… Louis XV (Paris: Hachette, 1929), PP- 797–799. The Supplément did not actually differ greatly in tone from the Encyclopédie on this point. If various Encyclopédie contributors were atheists and materialists, they hid the philosophy for the most part. What appeared in print often criticized the forms while respecting the substance.

    Google Scholar 

  4. The Supplément follows in this respect a marked current in eighteenth-century morality. Cf. the article “Humanité” in the Encyclopédie and Diderot’s emotion at the story of a forgiving son in Le Neveu de Rameau : “Ah! mon cher Rameau, cet homme regardait cet intervalle comme le plus heureux de sa vie; c’est les larmes aux yeux qu’il m’en parlait; et moi, je sens, en vous faisant ce récit, mon coeur se troubler de joie et le plaisir me couper la parole” (Oeuvres romanesques , ed. H. Bénac [Paris: Garnier Frères, 1962 ], p. 432).

    Google Scholar 

  5. For example, Letter LXXX in Lettres persanes , ed. P. Vernière (Paris: Gamier Frères, i960), pp. 169–171.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Alphonse Aulard, Histoire politique de la Révolution française… (1789–1804) (Paris: Armand Colin, 1901), pp. 6–13, summarizes the sentiment about the prevailing form of government among such pre-Revolutionary writers as Voltaire, Montesquieu, and Mably. In general, these writers were not overtly anti-monarchist, but they did spread republican ideas (e.g., that the king is a citizen) which sapped the monarchy.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lester Crocker, Nature and Culture: Ethical Thought in the French Enlightenment (Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins Press, 1963), pp. 454–455, recalls that optimism in the eighteenth century was not about man, but about what could be done with him. He corroborates what appears to be true in the Supplément , that the thinking class, in different degrees, despised the people.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dated December 4, 1765, in Corr ., ed, Roth, V, 208.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1977 Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague, Netherlands

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hardesty, K. (1977). Utility and Reform. In: The Supplément to the Encyclopédie. Archives Internationales D’Histoire des Idées International Archives of the History of Ideas, vol 89. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-9660-1_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-9660-1_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-009-9662-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-9660-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics