Microscopy of Polymer Surfaces

  • D. Hemsley

Summary

The surface topography of a polymer can be examined by a variety of microscopical methods. The choice of method depends upon the physical and chemical nature of the surface to be studied, the resolution range likely to be needed and whether qualitative or quantitative results are required.

As is true for any branch of microscopy, good results depend heavily upon correctly selected and properly carried out preparative procedures. Some modern as well as established methods are discussed, emphasis being placed on the image contrast that a particular combination of optical system and specimen treatment will produce. Recent trends include the trend towards sputter coating in preference to evaporation methods for surface coating, the adoption and adaptation of interferometric techniques for routine surface examination and the use of chemical and ion etching methods to enhance surface detail.

A number of applications of polymer surface microscopy are described which illustrate the current usage of this technique in the field of polymer technology.

Keywords

Sulphide Hydrocarbon Rubber Brittle Tungsten 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Goodhew, P., Specimen preparation in materials science, North-Holland, London (1973).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Murr, L. E., Electron optical applications in materials science, McGraw-Hill Inc., Maidenhead (1970).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ramply, D. N., J. Microscopy, 107, 99 (1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Echlin, P. and Hyde, P. W., Proc. 5th Ann. SEM Symposium, IITRI, Chicago 137–143 (1972).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Simmens, S. C., J. Microscopy, 105, 233 (1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Glauert, A. M., Practical methods in electron microscopy, North-Holland London (1972).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Moleik, M., Prakt. Mtallog., 4, 630 (1967).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bradley, O. E., Brit. J. App. Phys., 10, 198 (1959).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Evans, L. J., Bucknall, C. B. and Hall, M. M., Plastics and Polymers, 39, 118 (1971).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bucknall, C. B., Drinkwater, I. C. and Keast, W. E., Polymer, 13, 115 (1972).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Briggs, D., Brewis, D. M. and Konieczo, M. B., J. Mat. Sci., 11, 1270 (1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Warner, S. B., Uhlmann, D. R. and Peebles, L. H., J. Mat. Sci., 10, 958 (1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Strong, S. L., J. Mat. Sci., 9, 993 (1974).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Breedon, J. E., Jackson, J. F., Marcinkowski, M. J. and Taylor, M. E., J. Mat. Sci., 8, 1071 (1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kiselar, M. R., Evko, E. I. and Luk ‘yanovich, V. M., Zavodskaya Lab., 32, 201 (1966).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Swift, J. A., Paper presented at ‘Microscopy of Polymers and Fibres Symposium’, Leeds (1977).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Tolanski, S., Microstructures of surfaces using interferometry, Arnold, London (1968).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sikorski, J., 4th International Conference, Electron Micro., Berlin, 1, 686 (1958).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Goldstein, J. I. and Yakowitz, H., Practical scanning electron microscopy, Plenum, London (1975).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hewle, J. W. S., Sparrow, J. T. and Cross, P. M., The use of the scanning electron microscope, Pergamon, Oxford (1972).Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Steyn, J. B., Giles, P. and Holt, D. B., J. Microscopy, 107, 107 (1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    DE Mets, M., Howlett, K. J. and Yoffe, A. D., J. Microscopy, 102, 125 (1974).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Barnett, W. A., Wise, M. L. H. and Jones, E. C., J. Microscopy, 105, 299 (1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Grubb, D. T., J. Mat. Sci., 9, 1715 (1974).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Griffin, G. J. L., Scanning microscopy of polymer coatings, Applied Polymer Symposium No. 16, Interscience, New York (1970).Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Gale, G. M., Rapra Research Report 155 (1967).Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Beahan, P., Bevis, M. and Hull, D., Proc. Roy. Soc, A.343, 525 (1975).Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Kusy, R. P., Lee, H. B. and Turner, D. T., J. Mat. Sci., 11, 118 (1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Truss, R. W. and Chadwick, G. A., J. Mat. Sci., 12, 1383 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Andrews, E. H., Fracture in polymers, Oliver & Boyd, Edinburgh (1965).Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Sleytr, U. B. and Robards, A. W., J. Microscopy, 110, 1 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Applied Science Publishers Ltd 1978

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. Hemsley
    • 1
  1. 1.Loughborough University of TechnologyUK

Personalised recommendations