Skip to main content

Don’t Shoot The Trumpeter - He’s Doing His Best!

Reflections on a Problem of Fair Division

  • Chapter
Game Theory, Social Choice and Ethics
  • 336 Accesses

Abstract

R. B. Braithwaite’s story of the pianist and trumpeter with adjoining rooms is presented, and his solution to the problem of dividing playing time fairly between them is discussed, along with alternative solutions that have been put forward. These solutions are criticized for the shared assumption that the object of distribution is utility rather than opportunity. The author proposes a different approach and works out its implications for the problem of the pianist and the trumpeter in three variants. In conclusion, the relevance of the analysis to wider issues of distribution is briefly considered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  • Axelrod, R.: 1970, Conflict of Interest (Markham, Chicago).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartos, O. J.: 1967, Simple Models of Group Behavior (Columbia University Press, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Braithwaite, R. B.: 1955, Theory of Games as a Tool for the Moral Philosopher (Cambridge University Press, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gauthier, D.: 1974a, ‘Justice and natural endowment’, Social Theory and Practice 3, 3–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gauthier, D.: 1974b, ‘Rational cooperation’, Nous 8, pp. 53–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gauthier, D.: 1975, ‘Reason and maximization’, Canadian Journal of Philosophy 4, pp. 411–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gauthier, D.: 1977, ‘The social contract as ideology’, Philosophy and Public Affairs 6, pp. 130–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hare, R. M.: 1963, Freedom and Reason (Clarendon Press, Oxford).

    Google Scholar 

  • Harsanyi, J. C.: 1955, ‘Cardinal welfare, individualistic ethics, and interpersonal comparisons of utility’, Journal of Political Economy 63, pp. 309–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harsanyi, J. C.: 1975, ‘Can the maximin principle serve as a basis for morality? A critique of John Rawls’s theory’, American Political Science Review 69, pp. 594–606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harsanyi, J. C.: 1977, Rational Behavior and Bargaining Equilibrium in Games and Social Situations (Cambridge University Press, London).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, J. R.: 1959, ‘Moralists and gamesmen’, Philosophy 34, pp. 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luce, R. D. and Raiffa, H.: 1957, Games and Decisions (Wiley, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nash, J. F.: 1950, ‘The bargaining problem’, Econometrica 18, pp. 155–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicholson, M.: 1970, Conflict Analysis (The English Universities Press, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J.: 1958, ‘Justice as fairness’, Philosophical Review 67, pp. 164–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J.: 1969, ‘Distributive justice’, in Peter Laslett and W. G. Runciman (eds.), Philosophy, Politics and Society, 3rd Series (Blackwell, Oxford).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J.: 1971, A Theory of Justice (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J.: 1975, ‘Fairness to goodness’, The Philosophical Reveiw 84, pp. 536–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. K.: 1970, Collective Choice and Social Welfare (Holden-Day, San Francisco).

    Google Scholar 

  • Smart, J. C. C.: 1973, ‘An outline of a system of utilitarian ethics’, in J. C. C. Smart and Bernard Williams (eds.), Utilitarianism: For and Against (Cambridge University Press, London).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

H. W. Brock

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1979 D. Reidel Publishing Co., Dordrecht, Holland, and Boston, U.S.A.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Barry, B. (1979). Don’t Shoot The Trumpeter - He’s Doing His Best!. In: Brock, H.W. (eds) Game Theory, Social Choice and Ethics. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-9532-1_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-9532-1_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-009-9534-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-9532-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics