Plasma Flow in the Magnetotail and its Implications for Substorm Theories

  • E. W. HonesJr.
Part of the Astrophysics and Space Science Library book series (ASSL, volume 78)


The neutral line theory of substorms has evolved from early thinking about magnetic energy conversion in solar flares and in the outer magnetosphere and has now attained a relatively high level of sophistication. Some large-scale phenomena that are predicted by this theory are (a) plasma will flow rapidly earthward and tailward along the tail’s midplane away from the merging region; (b) the component of the magnetic field normal to the midplane will be oppositely directed on the two sides of the merging region; (c) in large substorms magnetic merging can reach the field lines bounding the plasma sheet, possibly causing loss of the tail ward portion of the plasma sheet to the solar wind. Observations with satellites located near the center of the tail at distances beyond 20 RE have revealed combinations of these phenomena occurring in more than 25 substorms and often agreeing in remarkable detail with predictions of the theory. This paper deals primarily with plasma flow measurements during substorms and reports on a recent study that shows tailward flow to be much more prevalent than earthward flow during the expansive phase of substorms. This finding tends to contradict an earlier study that reported instances of earthward flow to far outnumber instances of tailward flow during (substorm-related) plasma sheet thinnings. It calls into question a “rarefaction wave model” of substorms that was partially based on that earlier report.


Solar Wind Field Line Plasma Flow Plasma Sheet Neutral Line 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Akasofu, S.-I.: 1977, Physics of Magnetospheric Substorms, (p. 358), D. Reidel Publ. Co., Dordrecht-Holland.Google Scholar
  2. Chao, J. K., Kan, J. R., Lui, A. T. Y., and Akasofu, S.-I: 1977, Planet. Space Sci. 25, pp. 703–710.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Coppi, B., Laval, G., and Pellat, R.: 1966, Phys. Rev. Lett. 16, pp. 1207–1210ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Frank, L. A., Ackerson, K. L., and Lepping, R. P.: 1976, J. Geophys. Res. 81, pp. 5859–5881.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Galeev, A. A. and Zeleny, L. M., Theoretical and Computational Plasma Physics, International Atomic Energy Agency Publication IAEA-SMR-31/100.Google Scholar
  6. Hones, E. W., Jr.: 1977, J. Geophys. Res. 82, pp. 5633–5640.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hones, E. W., Jr.: 1979, Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory preprint LA-UR 78–245, (to be published in Space Science Reviews).Google Scholar
  8. Hones, E. W., Jr., Asbridge, J. R., Barne, S. J., Montgomery, M. D., and Akasofu, S.-I.: 1972, J. Geophys. Res. 77, pp. 5503–5522.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hones, E. W., Jr., Barne, S. J., and Asbridge, J. R.: 1976, J. Geophys. Res. 81, pp. 227–234.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hones, E. W., Jr., Palmer, I. D., and Higbie, P. R.: 1976, J. Geophys. Res. 81, pp. 3866–3874.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hones, E. W., Jr., and Schindler, K.: 1979, J. Geophys. Res., to be published.Google Scholar
  12. Lui, A. T. Y., Meng, C.-I., and Akasofu, S.-I.: 1977a, J. Geophys. Res. 82, pp. 1547–1565.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lui, A. T. Y., Frank, L. A., Ackerson, K. L., Meng, C. I. and Akasofu, S.-I.: 1977b, J. Geophys. Res. 82, pp. 4815–4925.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Schindler, K.: 1974, J. Geophys. Res. 79, pp. 2803–2810.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Roelof, E. C., Keath, E. P., Bostrom, C. O., and Williams, D. J.: 1976, J. Geophys. Res. 81, pp. 2304–2314.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© D. Reidel Publishing Company 1979

Authors and Affiliations

  • E. W. HonesJr.
    • 1
  1. 1.Los Alamos Scientific LaboratoryUniversity of CaliforniaLos AlamosUSA

Personalised recommendations