Abstract
The topic “questions and categories” is suggested by the fact that, in the original list of categories given by Aristotle, the names of six out of ten categories are interrogative in form: What is it? (τί έστι), How much? (ποσόυ), Of what sort? (ποιόν, qualis), Towards what? or Relative to what? (πόρς τι), Where? (που) and When? (ποτϵ)-1 And in the case of the four categories whose names are not interrogative in form, it is easy to represent them as answers to questions: What did he do? for action (ποιϵίυ); What did he suffer? for passion or being-acted-upon (πάσχϵιυ); What is he wearing? or How is he disposed? for the category of having or habitus (έχϵιυ); and What is his position? or How is he situated? for posture or situs (Кϵίσθαι). Hence it is an old observation, made by William of Ockham and probably not for the first time, that Aristotle’s classification of the categories is derived from a list of interrogative forms or questions asked in reference to a given subject - in reference to a man, for example, or some other individual substance. As Ockham says, every uncombined term (i.e. every uncombined word or concept) “by which one can answer a question posed concerning a substance is in some category. …But other uncombined terms are not in any category.”2 The categories of Aristotle do not represent a complete logical inventory, a classification of all terms or concepts represented in language. They do attempt to classify all the terms of a basic object language, where these terms are specified by the questions that can be asked or answered concerning an individual subject.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Bibliography
Ackrill, J. L.: 1963, Aristotle’s “Categories” and “De Interpretatione” ( Oxford: Clarendon).
Adjukiewicz, Kazimierz: 1935, ‘Syntactic Connexion’, in Polish Logic, 1920–1939, ed. Storrs McCall ( Oxford: Clarendon, 1967 ), 207–31.
Annas, Julia: 1974, ‘Forms and first principles’, Phronesis 19, 257–283.
Apelt, Otto: 1891, ‘Die Kategorienlehre des Aristoteles’, in Beiträge zur Geschichte der griechischen Philosophic ( Leipzig: Teubner ), 101–216.
Aubenque, Pierre: 1962, Le probleme de I’être chez Aristote ( Paris: Presses Universitaires de France).
Bassenge, Friedrich: 1960, ‘Das τò ενί είναι und das τò τί ην είναι bei Aristoteles’, Philoogus 104, 14–47 and 201–222.
Benveniste Emile: 1958, ‘Catégories de pensée et categories de langue’, in Problémes de linguistique générale ( Paris: Gallimard, 1966 ), 63–74.
Bonitz, Hermann: 1853, Überdie Kategorien des Aristoteles ( Vienna: Staatsdruckerei).
Brentano, Franz: 1862, Von der mannigfachen Bedeutung des Seienden nach Aristoteles ( Freiburg: Herder).
Carnap, Rudolf: 1937, The Logical Syntax of Language, transl. by A. Smeaton ( London: Routledge and Kegan Paul).
Chomsky, Noam: 1965, Aspects of the Theory of Syntax ( Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T.).
Cooke, Harold P.: 1938, Aristotle, The Organon I: The Categories, The Loeb Classical Library ( London: Heinemann).
De Rijk, Lambertus M.: 1952, The Place of the Categories of Being in Aristotle’s Philosophy ( Assen: Van Gorcum).
Gillespie, C. M.: 1913, ‘The Logic of Antisthenes’, Archiv fur Geschichte der Philosophie 26, 479–500.
Gomperz, Theodor: 1912, Greek Thinkers, vol. 4, transl. by G. G. Berry ( London: Murray).
Harris, Zellig: 1968, Mathematical Structures of Language (= Interscience Tracts in Pure and Applied Mathematics 21) ( New York: John Wiley).
Hintikka, Jaakko: 1973, ‘Aristotle and the Ambiguity of Ambiguity’, Time and Necessity ( Oxford: Clarendon ), 1–26.
Hiż, Henry: 1960, ‘The Intuitions of Grammatical Categories’, Methodos 12, 1–9.
Husik, Isaac: 1904, ‘On the Categories of Aristotle’, Philosophical Review 13, 514–528 (reprinted in Philosophical Essays, Oxford: Blackwell, 1952 ).
Husserl, Edmund: 1913, Logische Untersuchungen, 2 vols, in three parts 2nd ed. ( Tübingen: Niemeyer).
Kahn, Charles H.: 1966, ‘The Greek Verb “to be” and the Concept of Being’, Foundations of Language 2, 245–265.
1972, ‘On the Terminology for Copula and Existence’, Islamic Philosophy and the Classical Tradition: Essays presented to Richard Walzer (Oxford: Cassirer).
1973, The Verb ‘Be’ in Ancient Greek (= The Verb ‘Be’ and its Synonyms, Part 6) (Dordrecht: Reidel).
Kapp, Ernst: 1920, ‘Die Kategorienlehre in der aristotelischen Topik’ (Habilitations-schrift), in Ausgewählte Schriften ( Berlin: De Gruyter, 1968 ).
1942, Greek Foundations of Traditional Logic (New York: Columbia).
Kirwan, Christopher: 1971, Aristotle’s ‘Metaphysics’, Books Γ, Δ, and E ( Oxford: Clarendon).
Lyons, John: 1968, Introduction to Theoretical Linguistics ( Cambridge: University Press).
Mansion, Suzanne: 1968, ‘Notes sur la doctrine des catégories dans les Topiques’, Aristotle on Dialectic: the Topics, ed. G. E. L. Owen ( Oxford: Clarendon ), 189–201.
Montague, Richard: 1974, Formal Philosophy. Selected Papers of Richard Montague. Edited and with an introduction by Richmond H. Thomason ( New Haven and London: Yale).
Moravcsik, J. M. E: 1967, ‘Aristotle’s Theory of Categories’, in Aristotle. A Collection of Critical Essays, ed. J. M. E. Moravcsik ( Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday, 1967 ).
Owen, G. E. L.: 1960, ‘Logic and Metaphysics in some earlier Works of Aristotle’, Aristotle and Plato in the Mid-Fourth Century ( Goteborg: Studia Graeca ), 169–90.
1965 (1), ‘The Platonism of Aristotle’, Proceedings of the British Academy 51, 125–50.
1965 (2), ‘Aristotle on the Snares of Ontology’, in New Essays on Plato and Aristotle, ed. R. Bambrough (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul ), 69–95.
Dialectic and Eristic in the Treatment of Forms’, Aristotle on Dialectic (Oxford: Clarendon), 103–25.
Passmore, John: 1966, A Hundred Years of Philosophy, 2nd ed. ( London: Duckworth).
Ross, W. D.: 1924, Aristotle’s Metaphysics, 2 vols. ( Oxford: Clarendon )
1949, Aristotle’s Prior and Posterior Analytics (Oxford: Clarendon).
Russell, Bertrand: 1903, The Principles of Mathematics ( London: Allen and Unwin).
Ryle, Gilbert: 1938, ‘Categories’, in Collected Papers II ( New York: Barnes and Noble, 1971 ), 170–84.
Solmsen, Friedrich: 1968, ‘Dialectic without the Forms’, Aristotle on Dialectic ed. Owen ( Oxford: Clarendon ), 49–68.
Steinthal, H.: 1890, Geschichte der Sprachwissenschaft bei den Griechen und Römern ( Berlin: Dümmlers) I, 206–234.
Thompson, Manley: 1967, ‘Categories’, Encyclopedia of Philosophy ed. Paul Edwards, Vol. 2 ( New York: Macmillan ), 46–55.
Thorp, J. W.: 1974, ‘Aristotle’s use of Categories’, Phronesis 19, 238–256.
Trendelenburg, Adolf: 1846, Geschichte der Kategorienlehre (= Historische Beiträge zur Philosophic I ) Berlin: Bethge ).
1852,Elementa logices aristoteleae, 4th ed. (Berlin: Bethge).
von Fritz, Kurt: 1931, ‘Der Ursprung der aristotelischen Kategorienlehre’, Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 40, 449–96.
Vuillemin, Jules: 1967, De la Logique éla Theologie: Gnque Etudes sur Aristote ( Paris: Flammarion).
Wilpert, Paul: 1949, Zwei aristotelische Frühschriften über die Ideenlehre ( Regensburg: Habbel).
Wittgenstein, Ludwig: 1921, Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus, transl. by D. F. Pears and B. F. McGuinness (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1961 ).
Zeller, Eduard: 1879, Die Philosophic der Griechen, Zweiter Teil, Zweite Abteilung, 3rd ed. ( Leipzig: Fues).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1978 D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, Holland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kahn, C.H. (1978). Questions and Categories. In: Hiż, H. (eds) Questions. Synthese Language Library, vol 1. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-9509-3_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-9509-3_8
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-277-1035-2
Online ISBN: 978-94-009-9509-3
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive