Skip to main content

Yes—No Questions Are Not Alternative Questions

  • Chapter
Questions

Part of the book series: Synthese Language Library ((SLAP,volume 1))

Abstract

The first person as best I can recall who suggested that yes—no questions be regarded as a special type of alternative question was H. O. Coleman in 1914. He was followed by Harold Palmer in 1922 (78) and by Gerhard Dietrich in 1937 (242–43). Navarro Tomas in 1944 mentioned Dietrich’s treatment (167) but expressed doubts about it. In 1957 I reviewed the arguments and added some doubts of my own (114–15).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  • Bolinger, Dwight: 1957, Interrogative Structures of American English: The Direct Question. Publication No. 28 of the American Dialect Society ( University, Alabama).

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, H. O.: 1974, ‘Intonation and Emphasis’, Miscellanea Phonetica 1, 11–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dietrich, Gerhard: 1937, ‘Intonation und Syntax’, Zeitschrift für Neusprachlichen Unterricht 36, 239–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diver, William: 1964, ‘The Modal System of the English Verb’, Word 20, 322–352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, Zellig: 1968, Mathematical Structures of Language (New York, Sydney, Toronto: Interscience Publishers).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jespersen, Otto: 1928, A Modern English Grammar on Historical Principles. Part 3: Syntax, second volume (London: Allen and Unwin ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, Jerrold J. and Paul M. Postal: 1964, An Integrated Theory of Linguistic Descriptions ( Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T. Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Langacker, Ronald: 1970, ‘English Question Intonation’. In Jerrold M. Sadock and Anthony L. Vanek (eds.), Studies Presented to Robert B. Lees by his Students. Papers in Linguistics Monograph Series no. 1, 139–161 ( Edmonton, Alberta and Champaign, Illinois: Linguistic Research ).

    Google Scholar 

  • 1974, ‘The Question of Q’, Foundations of Language 11, 1–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Navarro Tomás, Tomas: 1944, Manual de entonacion española ( New York: Hispanic Institute in the United States).

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, Harold E.: 1922, English Intonation, with Systematic Exercises (Cambridge, England: W. Heffer and Sons).

    Google Scholar 

  • Stockwell, Robert P.: Paul Schachter and Barbara Hall Partee: 1968, Integration of Transformational Theories on English Syntax. USAF Contract AF19(628–6007, Project 2801 ( Los Angeles: University of California).

    Google Scholar 

  • Visser, F. Th: 1969, An Historical Syntax of the English Language. Part 3, first half ( Leiden: E. J. Brill).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1978 D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, Holland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bolinger, D. (1978). Yes—No Questions Are Not Alternative Questions. In: Hiż, H. (eds) Questions. Synthese Language Library, vol 1. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-9509-3_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-9509-3_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-277-1035-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-9509-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics