Skip to main content

Methodology and Theoretical Assumptions

  • Chapter
  • 92 Accesses

Part of the book series: Synthese Language Library ((SLAP,volume 8))

Abstract

The essence of language is human activity — activity on the part of one individual to make himself understood by another, and activity on the part of that other to understand what was in the mind of the first. These two individuals, the producer and the recipient of language, or as we may more conveniently call them, the speaker and the hearer, and their relations to one another, should never be lost sight of if we want to understand the nature of language and of that part of language which is dealt with in grammar (Jespersen, 1965, p. 17).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. As an example of a ‘culturally’ pragmatic definition of presupposition, see Keenan’s ‘Two Kinds of Presupposition in Natural Language’ (1971, p. 49).

    Google Scholar 

  2. On the other hand, Karttunen and Peters (1977) may be right in calling certain presuppositions ‘conventional implicatures’, particularly if conventional implicature is interpreted as being equivalent to literal meaning.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Keenan (1970) makes several similar points.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Allen (1966), Dowty (1972), Kittredge (1970), Palmer (1968), Prince (1974), etc.

    Google Scholar 

  5. This terminology is from Prince (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  6. This does not mean, however, that progressive constructions cannot occur in sentences with perfective main verbs. Comrie (1976, p. 23) gives the example, ‘It happened (perfective) one day that I was walking (imperfective) along the street...”

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kittredge (1970) makes just this claim calling start, begin, etc. ‘perfectivizers’.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1979 D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, Holland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Freed, A.F. (1979). Methodology and Theoretical Assumptions. In: The Semantics of English Aspectual Complementation. Synthese Language Library, vol 8. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-9475-1_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-9475-1_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-277-1011-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-9475-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics