Skip to main content

On Suppositio and Denotation

  • Chapter
Book cover Pragmatics, Truth, and Language

Part of the book series: Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science ((BSPS,volume 38))

  • 131 Accesses

Abstract

In his monumental A History of Formal Logic,1 in the section on Scholastic Logic (Part III), Father Bocheński comments (p. 173) that

if we ask how the expression Supposition’ is to be rendered in modern terms, we have to admit that it cannot be. ‘Supposition’ covers numerous semiotic functions for which we now have no common name. Some kinds of supposition quite clearly belong to semantics, as in the case of both material suppositions, and personal; others again, such as simple supposition and those into which personal supposition is subdivided, are. . . . not semantical but purely syntactical functions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. I.M. Bocheński, A History of Formal Logic, pp. 162 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  2. As in Truth and Denotation, Chapters IV and V.

    Google Scholar 

  3. N. Kretzmann’s translation is used here in part. See his edition of William of Sherwood, Introduction to Logic (University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis: 1966), p. 107.

    Google Scholar 

  4. See Truth and Denotation, Chapters XI and XII.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cf. H. Reichenbach, Elements of Symbolic Logic.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cf. R. Carnap, The Logical Syntax of Language.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cf. H. Hiż, ‘The Role of Paraphrase in Grammar,’ in Monograph Series on Language and Linguistics (April, 1964) and Belief, Existence, and Meaning, pp. 163 f., pp. 213 f.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cf. the definition of ‘Ext’ in Truth and Denotation, p. 106.

    Google Scholar 

  9. See Chapters VII and VIII below. An interesting alternative systematic treatment of process is that of Laurent larouche, ‘Examination of the Axiomatic Foundations of a Theory of Change,’ Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 9 (1968): 371–384 and 10 (1969): 277–284 and 385–409.

    Google Scholar 

  10. William Kneale and Martha Kneale, The Development of Logic (Clarendon Press, Oxford: 1962), pp. 253 ff.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1979 D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, Holland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Martin, R.M. (1979). On Suppositio and Denotation. In: Pragmatics, Truth, and Language. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol 38. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-9457-7_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-9457-7_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-277-0993-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-9457-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics