Abstract
“Of Logic,” Stuart Mill noted in his Inaugural Address at St. Andrews1 in 1867, “I venture to say, even if limited to that of mere ratiocination, the theory of names, propositions, and the syllogisms, that there is no part of intellectual education which is of greater value, or whose place can so ill be supplied by anything else.” The “theory of names” may perhaps be construed, in more modern terms, as the metalogical theory of reference or designational semantics. The theory of “mere ratiocination,” of “propositions,” and of the syllogism, is presumably wholly contained within first-order logic, that is, the theory of the truth-functional connectives, of quantifiers, and (perhaps) of identity. Thus Mill’s splendid comments may without distortion be viewed in the light of the newer developments in logical and metalogical theory.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
J.S. Mill, Dissertations and Discussions (Holt, New York: 1873), Vol. IV, pp. 332–407.
For related comments, see especially J.H. Woodger, The Axiomatic in Biology, the Preface, and R. Carnap, The Logical Syntax of Language, passim.
See especially Truth and Denotation, Chapter I.
See, however, H.G. Bohnert and P.O. Backer, Automatic English-to-Logic Translation in a Simplified Model, IBM Research 1967, and Logic, Language, and Metaphysics.
See Toward a Systematic Pragmatics and Belief, Existence, and Meaning.
See, however, Uriel Weinreich, ‘On the Semantic Structure of Language,’ in Universals of Language, edited by J. Greenberg (The M.I.T. Press, Cambridge (Mass.) and London: 1963).
C.S. Peirce, Collected Papers, Vol. VII, pp. 43 ff.
Mill, loc. cit., p. 373.
Loc. cit.
See P.T. Geach, ‘On Rigour in Semantics,’ Mind 58 (1949): 518–522.
Let us not commit here the one-language fallacy. See Belief, Existence, and Meaning and Logic, Language, and Metaphysics.
See his A Survey of Mathematical Logic (Studies in Logic and the Foundations of Mathematics, North-Holland, Amsterdam: 1963), p. 63.
On intensions, see Belief, Existence, and Meaning, Chapter VII. For platonic alternatives see the author’s ‘On Abstract Entities in Semantic Analysis,’ Noûs 2 (1969): 379–389 and ‘On Leonardian Intensions of Class-Terms’ in The Logical Way of Doing Things, edited by K. Lambert (Yale University Press, New Haven: 1969), p. 255–263.
See Belief, Existence, and Meaning, Chapter VI.
See John R. Searle, Speech Acts (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge: 1969), p. 15.
See his ‘Logic and Analysis,’ in Atti del XII Congresso Internazionale di Filosofia (Sansoni, Firenze: 1960), Vol. IV, pp. 77–81.
See his Our Knowledge of the External World (Norton, New York: 1929), Chapter II.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1979 D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, Holland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Martin, R.M. (1979). Of Logic, Learning, and Language. In: Pragmatics, Truth, and Language. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol 38. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-9457-7_21
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-9457-7_21
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-277-0993-6
Online ISBN: 978-94-009-9457-7
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive