Abstract
Nuel Belnap’s clear and vivid paper manifests in every line the positive tendency and constructive outlook that typifies its author. Nevertheless, I do have one bone to pick with him. I have problems with the motivation for playing down, or even abrogating the difference between commas and ampersands, between thejuxtaposition. of theses and their explicitconjunction., between what is said in one breath, and what is said in two, so to speak.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsEditor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1979 D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, Holland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rescher, N. (1979). Reply to Belnap. In: Sosa, E. (eds) The Philosophy of Nicholas Rescher. Philosophical Studies Series in Philosophy, vol 15. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-9407-2_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-9407-2_4
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-009-9409-6
Online ISBN: 978-94-009-9407-2
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive