Rescher’s Epistemological System
The main focus of Rescher’s recent work has been epistemology. In a series of interrelated books and articles,1 he has developed a comprehensive and novel epistemological position, one which is both labyrinthine in its complexity and also radically and deliberately eclectic. The resulting epistemological system defies any simple characterization or assessment. In this paper, I shall neglect many of its aspects in order to focus on what is arguably its core: Rescher’s account of the manner in which a theory of empirical knowledge is itself to be justified. Thus, adapting a familiar distinction from moral philosophy, our primary concern will be with Rescher’s meta-epistemological position, as opposed to his normative-epistemological position (though the distinction between these two is in the end much less sharp for Rescher than it is for most epistemologists). Focusing on the meta-epistemological issue will give us a thread which we may hope to follow through some selected parts of the labyrinthe without losing our way altogether.
KeywordsCoherence Stratification Defend Alan
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 2.Roderick Chisholm ; see his Theory of Knowledge, 2nd edition (Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1977)Google Scholar
- 7.William P. Alston, ‘Varieties of Privileged Access,’ American Philosophical Quarterly 8 (1971), pp. 223–41Google Scholar
- Anthony Quinton, ‘The Foundations of Knowledge,’ in British Analytical Philosophy, ed. Bernard Williams and Alan Montefiore (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1966)Google Scholar
- Anthony Quinton, The nature of Things (London: Routledgge & Kegan Paul, 1973)Google Scholar