Abstract
There is much that I find congenial in Richard Hare’s stimulating discussion, since I too have utilitarian inclinations. But our sympathies and conflicts can be clarified by some distinctions.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1979 D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, Holland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rescher, N. (1979). Reply to Hare. In: Sosa, E. (eds) The Philosophy of Nicholas Rescher. Philosophical Studies Series in Philosophy, vol 15. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-9407-2_20
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-9407-2_20
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-009-9409-6
Online ISBN: 978-94-009-9407-2
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive