Abstract
My paper ‘Simulating Clinical Judgment’ was written in response to a request, from the organizers of this symposium, to give an account of my work in a way which would provoke philosophical comment. Having now studied Ernan McMullin’s commentary on my paper I think I may claim to have achieved a certain measure of success in this endeavor, although McMullin’s comments are, I must admit, not quite what I expected.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Atkin, R. H.: 1974, Mathematical Structure in Human Affairs, Crane and Russak, New York.
Gedye, J. L.: 1979, ‘Simulating Clinical Judgment (1): An Essay in Technological Psychology’, this volume, pp. 93–113.
McMullin, E.: 1979, ‘A Clinician’s Quest for Certainty’, this volume, pp. 115–129.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1979 D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, Holland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gedye, J.L. (1979). A Reply to Ernan McMullin. In: Engelhardt, H.T., Spicker, S.F., Towers, B. (eds) Clinical Judgment: A Critical Appraisal. Philosophy and Medicine, vol 6. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-9399-0_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-9399-0_9
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-009-9401-0
Online ISBN: 978-94-009-9399-0
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive