Skip to main content

A Clinician’s Quest for Certainty

  • Chapter
Clinical Judgment: A Critical Appraisal

Part of the book series: Philosophy and Medicine ((PHME,volume 6))

Abstract

John Gedye began his paper by quoting Simone de Beauvoir who laments the fact that words force her into rigid categories, into blacks and whites that ill match a world in shades of grey. Inexorable, then, she cries, that in such a world truth should dwindle into insignificance. This is a cryptic saying to introduce a paper which will seek to strip the clinician of his customary grey language and force him to “black and white” assertions (p. 109) and “stringent criteria of certainty” (pp. 105–106). “Only when we have no alternative…”, Gedye admonishes his fellow-clinicians “should we accept having to fall back into the ‘gray’ world of weak probabilistic arguments” (p. 109). Are we to infer, then, that in the world of the clinician truth is doomed to dwindle into insignificance? I cannot believe that this is what Gedye intended, yet this is the moral of de Beauvoir’s remark.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bacon, F.: 1905, Novum Organon, P. Ellis and J. Spedding (transl.), G. Routledge and Sons, London.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bernard, C.: 1927, An Introduction to the Study of Experimental Medicine, transl. by H. C. Greene, Schuman, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Clifford, W. K.: 1872, ‘On the Aims and Instruments of Scientific Thought,’ in L. Stephen and F. Pollock (eds.), Lectures and Essays, Macmillan and Co., London.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Feinstein, A. R.: 1967, Clinical Judgment, Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore.

    Google Scholar 

  5. McMullin, E.: 1974, ‘Logicality and Rationality: A Comment on Toulmin’s Theory of Science,’ Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science 14, 415–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Maugh, T. H.: 1977, ‘Multiple Sclerosis: Genetic Links, Viruses Suspected,’ Science 195, 667–669.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Peirce, C. S.: 1933, ‘On the Algebra of Logic’, in C. Hartshorne and P. Weiss (eds.), Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Vol. III (Exact Logic ), pp. 104–157.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1979 D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, Holland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

McMullin, E. (1979). A Clinician’s Quest for Certainty. In: Engelhardt, H.T., Spicker, S.F., Towers, B. (eds) Clinical Judgment: A Critical Appraisal. Philosophy and Medicine, vol 6. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-9399-0_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-9399-0_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-009-9401-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-9399-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics