Skip to main content

When Does a Diagnosis Become a Clinical Judgment?

Verifiability, Reliability and Umbrella Effects in Diagnosis

  • Chapter
Clinical Judgment: A Critical Appraisal

Part of the book series: Philosophy and Medicine ((PHME,volume 6))

  • 98 Accesses

Abstract

To ask whether diagnosis is an art or a science is to make some interesting prior assumptions about the properties of diagnosis: That it is verifiable; that diagnosticians presented with identical data will concur in identical diagnoses; that the diagnosis usefully conveys information about the present status and prognosis of the patient; that it has treatment implications; and that it is not likely to be clouded by negative umbrella effects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  1. American Psychiatric Association: 1968, ‘Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-II)’, American Psychiatric Association, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Boisen, A. T.: 1938, ‘Types of Dementia Praecox - A Study in Psychiatric Classification’, Psychiatry 2, 233–236.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cochrane, A. L., and Garland, L. H.: 1952, ‘Observer Error in Interpretation of Chest Films’, Lancet 2, 505–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Cronbach, L. J., Gleser, G. C., Harinder, N., and Nageswari, R.: 1972, ‘The Dependability of Behavioral Measurements: Theory of Generalizability for Scores and Profiles’, New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Davies, L. G.: 1958, ‘Observer Variation in Reports on Electrocardiograms’, British Heart Journal 20, 153–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Engel, G. T.: 1977, ‘The Need for a New Medical Model: A Challenge for Biomedicine’, Science 196, 129–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Garland, L. H.: 1960, ‘The Problem of Observer Error’, Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine 36, 570–584.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gilson, J. C. and Oldham, P. D.: 1952, ‘Lung Function Tests in the Diagnosis of Pulmonary Emphysema: The Use of Discriminant Analysis’, Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine 45, 584–586.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Koran, L. M.: 1975, ‘The Reliability of Clinical Methods, Data and Judgments’, New England Journal of Medicine 293, 642–646 and 293, 695–701.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Meehl, P. E.: 1954, ‘Clinical Versus Statistical Prediction’, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, Minnesota.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  11. Reade, W. K., and Wertheimer, M.: 1976, ‘A Bias in the Diagnosis of Schizophrenia’, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 5, 878.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Rosenhan, D. L.: 1973, ‘On Being Sane in Insane Places’, Science 180, 250–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Rosenthal, D.: 1971, ‘Genetics of Psychopathology’, McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Rosenthal, D., and Kety, S. S. (eds.): 1968, The Transmission of Schizophrenia, Pergamon Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Spitzer, R. L. and Fleiss, J. L.: 1974, ‘A Reanalysis of the Reliability of Psychiatric Diagnosis’, British Journal of Psychiatry 125, 341–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Spitzer, R. L. and Wilson, P. T.: ‘Nosology and the Official Psychiatric Nomenclature’. In A.Freedman and H. Kaplan (eds.). Comprehensive Textbook of Psychiatry, Williams and Wilkins, in press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ward, C. H., Beck, A. T., Mendelson, M., Mock, J. E., and Erbaugh, J. K.: 1962, ‘The Psychiatric Nomenclature: Reasons for Diagnostic Disagreement’, Archives of General Psychiatry 7, 198–205.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Zigler, E., and Phillips, L.: 1961, ‘Psychiatric Diagnosis: A Critique’, Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 63, 607–618.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1979 D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, Holland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rosenhan, D.L. (1979). When Does a Diagnosis Become a Clinical Judgment?. In: Engelhardt, H.T., Spicker, S.F., Towers, B. (eds) Clinical Judgment: A Critical Appraisal. Philosophy and Medicine, vol 6. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-9399-0_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-9399-0_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-009-9401-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-9399-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics