Abstract
The ‘polar’ model of class relationships is only a simplified way of describing elements of those phenomena which actually occur as complex class structures. In naming that relationship antagonistic, we may disregard its psychological aspects, since we are concerned neither with the psychological antagonism of individuals nor with the structure of mental attitudes occurring in a social group as a result of the positions held by members of that group, but with the mutual relationship of those positions, which is the principle of the structure of the model. A given antagonistic mode of production consists in the association of definite social productive forces with definite social class relations. Those class relations consist, in turn, in the association of those social positions which make it possible to exercise a special form of power over the working conditions of other people, and to appropriate the product of their work, with those social positions which deprive their holders of the possibility of controlling their own working conditions and force them to part, in a special form, with the product of their work on behalf of those who exercise the power mentioned above. The antagonistic nature, or the opposition, of the two kinds of social positions thus associated has here the same meaning as the opposition of the two different and inseparable poles of a magnet which by its very nature is a ‘magnetic dipole’.
Fragments of the chapter ‘Marksowska ogolna teoria klas spolecznych’ (‘The General Marxian Theory of Social classes’), included in the book entitled Studia o marksowskiej teorii spoleczenstwa (Studies in the Marxian Social Theory), (Warsaw, 1963). The book was reviewed in The polish Sociological Bulletin, 2, 14, (1966). For an obituary notice on Julian Hochfeld see The Polish Sociological Bulletin, 2, 14, (1966).
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes and References
Cf. Max Weber, Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Wissenschaftslehre, Tubingen, 1951, (new edn.), pp. 100ff., and Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft, by the same author, Tubingen, 1956, (new edn.), pp. 1–11.
Cf. L. Goldmann, Sciences humaines et philosophie, Paris, 1952.
F. Engels, Ludwig Feuerbach and the Outcome of Classical german Philosophy.
K. Marx, Zur Kritik der Politischen Oekonomie.
k. marx and F. Engels, Letters.
Ibid.
This criterion was used in making a distinction between class consciousness, i.e. consciousness of a class group, and individual consciousness, in the paper by J. Hochfeld and S. Nowakowski, ‘Uwagi o wykorzystaniu pamietnikow do badan nad swiadomoscia proletariatu’ (‘Comments on Using memories in the Study of Proletarian Consciousness’), Mysl Filozoficzna, 4, (1953).
T. Geiger, Die Klassengersellschaft im Schmeltztigel, G. Kiepenheuer, Cologne, 1949, p. 114.
R. Dahrendorf, Class and Class Conflict in Industrial Society, Stanford University Press, Standford, 1959
K. Marx and F. Engels, Letters.
K. Marx, Zur Kritik der Politischen Oekonomie.
K. Marx and F. Engels, The Communist Manifesto.
K. Marx and F. Engels, Selected Works.
Ibid.
Ibid.
Cf. K. Marx, Capital, Vol. I, passim.
K. Marx and F. Engels, Selected Works.
F. Engels, The Peasant War in Germany.
K. Marx and F. Engels, The Communist Manifesto.
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1979 D. Reidel Publishing Company
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hochfeld, J. (1979). The Concept of Class Interest. In: Wiatr, J.J. (eds) Polish Essays in the Methodology of the Social Sciences. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol 29. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-9353-2_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-9353-2_2
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-277-0956-1
Online ISBN: 978-94-009-9353-2
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive