Advertisement

Questions of Method in the Consistency Problem of Quantum Mechanics [1968f]

  • Robert S. Cohen
  • John J. Stachel
Part of the Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science book series (BSPS, volume 21)

Abstract

Attempts to set up on an axiomatic basis an abstract ‘theory of measurement’ in quantum mechanics lead to imaginary difficulties and suggest speculations about non-physical effects which have no objective justification.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  1. [1]
    Jauch, J. M., Wigner, E. P., and Yanase, M. M., Nuovo Cim. 48B (1967), 144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    Wigner, E. P., ‘Remarks on the Mind-Body Question’, in The Scientist Speculates, I. J. Good, ed. ( Heinemann, London and Basic Books, New York, 1961 ) p. 284.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    Peierls, R., History of Science 4 (1965), 124; Scientific American 216 (1967), 137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    Born, M., Physik in Wandel meiner Zeit, Vieweg, Braunschweig, 1957; ‘Symbol and Reality’, in Natural Philosophy of Cause and Chance (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1949; Dover reprint. New York, 1964 ).Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    Bohr, N., and Rosenfeld, L., Mat. fys. Medd. Dan. Vid. Selsk. 12 (1933), No. 8. [English translation: this volume, p. 357].Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    Daneri, A., Loinger, A., and Prosperi, G. M., Nuclear Physics 33 (1962), 297; Nuovo Cim. 44B (1966), 119; Rosenfeld, L., Suppl. Progr. Theor. Phys., extra number (1965), 222. [See p. 536 of this volume].Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    Cf. Rosenfeld, L., Physics Today 16 (1963), 47 (English translation of relevant passage p. 48). [See p. 522 of this volume].Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    Renninger, M., Z. Phys. 158 (1960), 417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, Holland 1979

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert S. Cohen
  • John J. Stachel

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations