Abstract
The idea of Infinity implies the separation of the same with regard to the other, but this separation cannot rest on an opposition to the other which would be purely anti-thetical. Thesis and antithesis, in repelling one another, call for one another. They appear in opposition to a synoptic gaze that encompasses them; they already form a totality which, by integrating the metaphysical transcendence expressed by the idea of infinity, relativized it. An absolute transcendence has to be produced as non-integrateable. If separation then is necessitated by the production of Infinity overflowing its idea and therefore separated from the I inhabited by this idea (the preeminently inadequate idea), this separation must be accomplished in the I in a way that would not only be correlative and reciprocal to the transcendence in which the infinite maintains itself with respect to its idea in me, it must not only be the logical rejoinder of that transcendence; the separation of the I with regard to the other must result from a positive movement. Correlation does not suffice as a category for transcendence.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1991 Kluwer Academic Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Levinas, E. (1991). Separation and Discourse. In: Totality and Infinity. Martinus Nijhoff Philosophy Texts, vol 1. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-9342-6_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-9342-6_4
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-009-9344-0
Online ISBN: 978-94-009-9342-6
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive