Skip to main content

Further evidence on alternative procedures for testing of spatial autocorrelation among regression disturbances

  • Chapter
Exploratory and explanatory statistical analysis of spatial data

Abstract

It is well-known that the least-squares estimator of the vector of coefficients in a linear regression model is not Best-Linear Unbiased in the presence of autocorrelation. The problem was first recognized by statisticians dealing with temporal regression analysis. This led to the development of tests for temporal autocorrelation (see, for example, von Neumann, 1941; Durbin and Watson, 1950, 1951 and 1971). Because these tests require estimators for the unknown disturbances, attention was paid to the development of procedures to estimate the vector of disturbances. Apart from the obvious ordinary least squares (OLS) residuals we mention the best-linear unbiased scalar covariance (BLUS) estimator, which was proposed by Theil (1965) and Koerts (1967), and the best-linear unbiased fixed co- variance (BLUF) residuals, which are described in Dubbelman, Abrahamse and Koerts (1972). Recently, Phillips and Harvey (1974) proposed a recursive procedure to obtain estimates of the errors. Because their estimator also has the LUS properties, we will refer to it as the RELUS-vector.

The authors are indebted to Cornelis P. A. Bartels for providing his experiences in the field and for suggesting improvements on the paper.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Abrahamse, A. P. J. and Koerts, J. (1969), ‘A comparison between the power of the Durbin-Watson test and the power of the BLUS test’, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 64, 938–948.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartels, C. P. A. and Bertens, A. M. (1976), ‘A factor and regression analysis of regional differences in income-level and -concentration in the Netherlands’, Applied Economics, 8, 179–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartels, C. P. A. and Hordijk, L. (1977), ‘On the power of the generalized Moran Contiguity Coefficient in testing for spatial autocorrelation among regression disturbances’, Regional Science and Urban Economics, 7, 83–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cliff, A. D. and Ord, J. K. (1972), ‘Testing for spatial autocorrelation among regression residuals’, Geographical Analysis, 6, 267–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cliff, A. D. and Ord, J. K. (1973), Spatial autocorrelation, Pion, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubbelman, C., Abrahamse, A. P. J. and Koerts, J. (1972), ‘A new class of disturbance estimators in the general linear model’. Statistica Neerlandica, 26, 127–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Durbin, J. and Watson, G. S. (1950, 1951, 1971), ‘Testing for serial correlation in regression analysis’, Biometrika, 37, 409–428; 38, 159–178; 58, 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisz, M. (1963), Probability theory and mathematical statistics, Wiley. New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hepple, L. W. (1976), ‘A Maximum Likelihood model for econometric estimation with spatial data’, in I. Masser (ed.), Theory and practice in regional science, Pion, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kendall, M. G. and Stuart, A. (1973), The advanced theory of statistics, Griffin, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koerts, J. (1967), ‘Some further notes on disturbance estimates in regression analysis’, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 62, 169–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koerts, J. and Abrahamse, A. P. J. (1971), On the theory and application of the general linear model, 2nd ed., Rotterdam University Press, Rotterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • L’Esperanoe, W. L. and Taylor, D. (1975), ‘The power of four tests of autocorrelation in the linear regression model’, Journal of Econometrics, 3, 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neumann, J. von (1941), ‘Distribution of the ratio of the mean square successive difference to the variance’, Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 12, 367–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ord, J. K. (1975), ‘Estimation methods for models of spatial interaction’, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 70, 120–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, G. D. A. and Harvey, A.C. (1974), ‘A simple test for serial correlation in regresson analysis’. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 69, 93S–939.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Theil, H. (1965), ‘The analysis of disturbances in regression analysis’, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 60, 1067–1079.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Theil, H. (1971), Principles of econometrics, Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1979 Martinus Nijhoff Publishing

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Brandsma, A.S., Ketellapper, R.H. (1979). Further evidence on alternative procedures for testing of spatial autocorrelation among regression disturbances. In: Bartels, C.P.A., Ketellapper, R.H. (eds) Exploratory and explanatory statistical analysis of spatial data. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-9233-7_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-9233-7_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-009-9235-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-9233-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics