Skip to main content

On the Resolving Power of Principal Component Analysis in Plant Community Ordination

  • Chapter
Data-processing in phytosociology

Part of the book series: Advances in vegetation science I ((AIVS,volume 1))

  • 76 Accesses

Abstract

The method of principal component analysis (PCA) is commonly used for the ordination of plant communities (through relevés or synoptic tables). Its diffusion in ecology is due to the work of Goodall (1954), Dagnelie (1960), van Groenewoud (1965), Orlóci (1966, 1973), Austin & Orlóci (1966), Ivimey-Cook & Proctor (1967), van der Maarel (1969), and others. Although PCA is a statistical method, in ecology it serves as an ordination technique in indirect gradient analysis (Whittaker 1967) without much statistical content.

Contribution from the Working Group for Data-Processing in Phytosociology, International Society for Vegetation Science.

This work was supported by the Italian C.N.R. and the Centro di Calcolo dell’Università di Trieste within the framework of a broader project entitled ‘I metodi statistici e le loro applicazioni mediante l’uso dell’elaboratore’.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Austin. M. P. & L. Orlóci. 1966. Geometric models in ecology. II. An evaluation of some ordination techniques. J Ecol. 54: 217–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beeftink, W. G. 1966. Conspectus of the phanerogamic salt plant communities in the Netherlands. Biol. Jaarb. Dodenaea 30: 325–362.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dagnelie. P. 1960. Contribution à l’étude des communautés végétales par l’analyse factorielle. Bull. Serv. Carte Phytogéogr. B 5: 7–71. 93–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feoli, E. 1973. Un indice che stima il peso dei caratteri per classificazioni monoteoche. Giorn. Bot. Ital. 107 (6): 263–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feoli. E. 1977. A criterion for monothetic classification of phytosociological entities on the basis of species ordination. Vegelatio 33: 147–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodall. D. W. 1954. Objective methods for the classification of vegetation. III. An essay on the use of factor analysis. Austr. J. Bot. 2: 304–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodall, D. W. 1963. Continuum and individualistic association. Vegetatio II: 297–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodall, D. W. 1973. Sample similarity and species correlation. In: R. H. Whittaker (ed.), Handbook of vegetation science. Part V: Ordination and classi-fication of communities. Junk. The Hague, pp. 105–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gower. J. C. 1966. Some distance properties of latent root and vector methods used in multivariate analysts Biometrika 53: 325–338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gower, J. C. & G. J. S. Ross. 1969 Minimum spanning tree and single linkage clusteT analysis. Appl. Stat. 18: 54–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Groenewoud, H. van. 1965. Ordination and classification of some Swiss and Canadian forests by various biométrie and other methods. Ber. Geobot. Inst Rübel Zurich 36: 28–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • IBM. 1968. System/360 Scicntific Subroutine Package (360A-CN-03X). Version III. Programmer’s Manual Document H20-0205-3. IBM. White Plains. N.Y. p. 454

    Google Scholar 

  • Ivimey-Cook. R. B & M. C. F. Proctor. 1967. Factor analysis of data from an East Devon heath: a com parison of principal component and rotated solutions. J. Ecol. 55: 405–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaccard, P. 1901. Distribution de la flore alpine dans le Bassin des Dranses et dans quelques régions voisines. Bull Soc. Vaud. Sci Nat. 37: 241–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janssen, J. G. M. 1975. A simple clustering procedure for preliminary classification of very large sets of phvtosociological relevés. Vegetatio 30: 67–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maarel, E. van der. 1969. On the use of ordination models in phytosociology. Vegetatio 19: 21–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maarel, E. van der. L. Orlóci & S. Pignatti. 1976. Data-processing in phytosociology, retrospect and anti-cipation. Vegetatio 32: 65–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noy-Meir, I. 1973 Data transformation in ecological ordination. I. Some advantages of non-centering. J. Ecol. 61: 329–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noy-Meir. I., D. Walker & W. T. Williams. 1975. Data transformation in ecological ordination. II. On the meaning of data standardization. J. Ecol. 65: 773–800.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orlóci, 1. 1966 Geometric models in ecology. I. The theory and application of some ordination methods. J. Ecol. 54: 193–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orlóci. L. 1967. Data centering: A review and evaluation with reference to component analysis. Syst. Zool. 16: 208–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orlóci, L. 1972. On objective functions of phytosociological resemblance. Amer..Midi. Natur. 88: 28–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orlóci. L. 1973. Ordination by resemblance matrices. In: R. H. Whittaker (ed.), Handbook of vegetation science. Part V: Ordination and classification of vegetation. Junk, The Hague, pp. 249–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orlóci. L. 1975. On information flow in ordination. Vegetatio 29: 11–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orlód. L. 1975. Multivariate analysis in vegetation research. Junk, The Hague 276 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Roskam. E. 1971. Program Bulletin n. 16. Psychologisch Laboratorium, Nijmegen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sørensen. T. 1948. A method of establishing groups of equal amplitude in plant sociology based on similarity of species content, and its application to analysis of the vegetation on Danish Commons. Biol. Skr. 5: 1–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westhoff. V. & E van der Maarel. 1973. The Braun-Blanquet approach. In: R. H. Whittaker (ed.). Handbook of vegetation science, Part V: Ordination and classification of communities. Junk. The Hague, pp. 617–726.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whittaker. R. H. 1967. Gradient analysis of vegetation. Biol. Rev. 49: 201–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, J. H. 1965. The algebraic eigenvalue problem. Oxford University Press. London. 662 pp.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1980 Dr. W. Junk bv Publishers, The Hague

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Feoli, E. (1980). On the Resolving Power of Principal Component Analysis in Plant Community Ordination. In: van der Maarel, E., Orlóci, L., Pignatti, S. (eds) Data-processing in phytosociology. Advances in vegetation science I, vol 1. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-9194-1_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-9194-1_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-009-9196-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-9194-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics