Abstract
By vertical half field stimulation with a pattern reversal movement and a pattern flash, both Halliday’s results of an ipsilateral occipital response and those of Jeffreys of a contralateral occipital response could be confirmed. These discrepancies can be explained by assuming two occipital dipoles, in one of which is the origin of the CI of Jeffreys, while in the other the origin of Halliday’s main positive peak as well as CIII of Jeffreys can be located.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Blumhardt, L.D., Barrett, G. & A.M. Halliday: The asymmetrical visual evoked potential to pattern reversal in one half field and its significance for the analysis of visual field defects. Brit. J. Ophthal 61: 454–461 (1977).
Blumhardt, L.D., Barrett, G., Halliday, A.M. & A. Kriss: The effect of experimental’ scotomata’ on the ipsilateral and contralateral responses to pattern-reversal in one half-field. Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol. 45: 376–392 (1978).
Halliday, A.M. & W.F. Michael: Changes in pattern-evoked responses in man associated with the vertical and horizontal meridians of the visual field. J. Physiol. 208: 499–513 (1970).
Jeffreys, D.A. & J.G. Axford: Source locations of pattern-specific components of human visual evoked potentials. I. Component of striate cortical origin. Exp. Brain Res. 16: 1–21 (1972a).
Jeffreys, D.A. & J.G. Axford: Source locations of pattern-specific components of human visual evoked potentials. II. Components of extrastriate cortical origin. Exp. Brain Res. 16: 22–40 (1972b).
Kooi, K.A., Guvener, A.M. & B.K. Bagchi: Visually evoked responses in lesions of the higher optic pathways. Neurology 15: 841–854 (1965).
Oosterhuis, H.J.G.H., Ponsen, L., Jonkman, E.J. & O. Magnus: The average visual response in patients with cerebrovascular disease. Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol. 27: 23–34 (1969).
Vaughan, H. G., Katzman, R. & J. Taylor: Alterations of visual evoked response in the presence of homonymous visual defects. Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol. 15: 737–746 (1963).
Wildberger, H.G.H., Lith, G.H.M. van, Wijngaarde, R. & G.T.M. Mak: Visually evoked cortical potentials in the evaluation of homonymous and bitemporal visual field defects. Brit. J. Ophthal. 60: 273–278 (1976).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1980 Dr W. Junk by Publishers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Van Lith, G.H.M., Henkes, H.E., Vijfvinkel-Bruinenga, S.M. (1980). Asymmetric Pattern Evoked Responses and Stimulus Parameters. In: Schmöger, E., Kelsey, J.H. (eds) Visual Electrodiagnosis in Systemic Diseases. Documenta Ophthalmologica Proceeding Series, vol 23. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-9180-4_37
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-9180-4_37
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-009-9182-8
Online ISBN: 978-94-009-9180-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive