Advertisement

Microsismic and Acoustic Activity Associated with Hydraulic Fracture Propagation

  • F. H. Cornet
Conference paper

Abstract

Sismic and acoustic sources activated by the development of hydraulic fractures are discussed. It is shown that acoustic activity associated with crack extension should be high frequency; its existence depends upon pressure distribution at crack tip. For permeable fractured material, the increment in pore pressure in the vicinity of the hydraulic fracture may lead to some local slips which, in turn, can generate signals.

The frequency spectrum of these signals depends on the amount of injected volume and injection duration. In situ experiments carried out to investigate the possibility of mapping this activity in order to determine orientation and extent of a hydraulic fracture are presented. By comparison with previously published results, it is concluded that hydrophones are not appropriate for monitoring this type of acoustic activity. Further no low frequency induced seismicity has been observed although up to 12 m3 meters have been injected.

Keywords

Rock Mass Stress Intensity Factor Pore Pressure Hydraulic Fracture Major Principal Stress 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  1. Aki K., M. Fehler and S.A. Das; 1977 “Source mechanism of volcanic tremor: fluid driven crack models and their application to the 1963 kilauea eruption”. Jou.Volcanology and Geothermal Research; Vol.2 p. 259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barenblatt G.I.; 1962; “The mathematical theory of equilibrium cracks in brittle fracture”; Advanced appl. Mech. Vol. 7, p. 55, academic Press.Google Scholar
  3. Cornet F.H.; 1978; “Application de la fracturation hydraulique à la mesure in-situ des contraintes”; colloque scientifique J.Goguel. B.R.G.M. mémoire n°91.Google Scholar
  4. Cornet F.H.; 1979; “Comparative Analysis by the displacement discontinuity method of two energy criteria of fracture”; Jou. of app. Mech., Vol. 46 no. 2 p. 349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Griffith A.A.; 1921; “The phenomenon of rupture and flow in solids”; Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. London. Vol. A 221.Google Scholar
  6. Haimson B. and C. Fairhurst; 1969; “In situ stress determination at great depth by means of hydraulic fracturing”, 11th Symp. on Rock Mech., Berkeley. Somerton editor, p. 559.Google Scholar
  7. Hubbert M.K. and D.G. Willis; 1957; “Mechanics of hydraulic fracturing Petrol”. Trans.A.I.M.E., Vol. 210, p. 153.Google Scholar
  8. Irwin G.R.; 1957; “Analysis of stresses and strains near the end of a crack traversing a plate”; Jou. App. Mech., Vol 24, p. 361.Google Scholar
  9. Kehle R.O.; 1964; “Determination of tectonic stresses through analysi of hydraulic well fracturing”; Jou. Geophys. Res., Vol. 69, p. 259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory: 1976 — L.A.S.L. Hot Dry Rock Geothermal Project, Progress Report — LA-6525-PR. 1978 — Hot dry rock Geothermal energy development project; progress report for F.Y.1977; LA — 7109 — PR.Google Scholar
  11. Madariaga R.; 1979; “Seismic Radiation from earthquake models based on fracture mechanics”, S.I.A.M. — Am. Math. Soc. Vol. 12, p. 59.Google Scholar
  12. Power D.V., Schuster C.L., Hay R. and J. Twombly; 1976; Jou. Petrol. Techn., p. 1116Google Scholar
  13. Smith M.K.; 1956; “Noise Analysis and multiple seismometer theory ”; Geophysics, Vol. XXI, nb. 2, p.337–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© ECSC, EEC, EAEC, Brussels and Luxembourg 1980

Authors and Affiliations

  • F. H. Cornet
    • 1
  1. 1.Institut de Physique du GlobeUniversity Paris VIFrance

Personalised recommendations