Advertisement

Logical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics

  • M. L. Dalla Chiara
Part of the Synthese Library book series (SYLI, volume 149)

Abstract

It is very natural to recognise a strict analogy between the main problems concerning the logical foundations of quantum theory and most fundamental problems which have arisen in the field of the foundations of mathematics. In both cases (physics and mathematics) three fundamental classes of conceptual difficulties seem to have played a particularly relevant role:
  1. (1)

    The discovery of paradoxes, which led, in a natural way, to the attempt to axiomatise and formalise the theories under investigation.

     

Keywords

Quantum Mechanics Quantum Theory Physical Theory Classical Logic Quantum Logic 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  1. [1]
    M. I. Dalla Chiara and G. Toraldo di Francia, ‘A Logical Analysis of Physical Theories’, Rivista del Nuovo Cimento 3 (1973), 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    M. L. Dalla Chiara and G. Toraldo di Francia, ‘The Logical Dividing Line between Deterministic and Indeterministic Theories’, Studia Logica XXXV (1976), 1–5.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    M. L. Dalla Chiara and G. Toraldo di Francia, ‘Formal Analysis of Physical Theories’, in G. Toraldo di Francia (ed.), Problems in the Foundations of Physics, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1979.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    R. Wojcicki, ‘Set Theoretic Representation of Empirical Phenomena’, Journal of Philosophical Logic 3 (1974), 337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    M. L. Dalla Chiara, ‘A Multiple Sentential Logic for Empirical Theories’, in M. Przełecki, K. Szaniawski, and R. Wojcicki (eds.), Formal Methods in the Methodology of Empirical Sciences, Ossolineum, Warsaw, 1976.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    G. Hardegree, ‘The Conditional in Quantum Logic’, in P. Suppes (ed.), Logic and Probability in Quantum Mechanics, D. Reidel Publ. Co., Dordrecht, Holland, 1976.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    H. Putnam, ‘Is Logic Empirical?’, in R. Cohen and M. Wartowski (eds.), Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, V, D. Reidel Publ. Co., Dordrecht, Holland, 1969.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    A. Fine, ‘Some Conceptual Problems of Quantum Theory’, in R. Colodny (ed.), Paradigms and Paradoxes, University of Pittsburg Press, Pittsburg, 1972.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    M. L. Dalla Chiara, ‘A General Approach to Non-Distributive Logics’, Studia Logica XXXV (1976), 139–162.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    H. Dishkant, ‘Semantics for the Minimal Logic of Quantum Mechanics’, Studia Logica XXX (1972), 23–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    R. I. Goldblatt, ‘Semantic Analysis of Orthologic’, Journal of Philosophical Logic 3 (1974), 19–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    M. L. Dalla Chiara, ‘Quantum Logic and Physical Modalities’, Journal of Philosophical Logic 6 (1974), 391–404.Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    P. Mittelstaedt, Philosophical Problems of Modern Physics (Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, XIII ), D. Reidel Publ. Co., Dordrecht, Holland, 1976.Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    P. Mittelstaedt and E. W. Stachow, ‘Operational Foundation of Quantum Logic’, Foundations of Physics 4 (1974), 355–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    P. Mittelstaedt, ‘Quantum Logic’, in G. Toraldo di Francia (ed.), Problems in the Foundations of Physics, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1979.Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    S. Kochen and E.P. Specker, ‘The Problem of Hidden Variables in Quantum Mechanics’, Journal of Mathematical Mechanics 17 (1967), 59–87.Google Scholar
  17. [17]
    M. L. Dalla Chiara, ‘Some Logical Problems suggested by Empirical Theories’, Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, (to be published).Google Scholar
  18. [18]
    J. M. Jauch, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Addison-Wesley, 1968.Google Scholar
  19. [19]
    B. van Fraassen, ‘A Formal Approach to Philosophy of Science’, in R. Colodny (ed.), Paradigms and Paradoxes, University of Pittsburg Press, Pittsburg, 1972.Google Scholar
  20. [20]
    B. van Fraassen, ‘The Einstein-Podolski-Rosen Paradox’, in P. Suppes (ed.), Logic and Probability in Quantum Mechanics, D. Reidel Publ. Co., Dordrecht Holland, 1976.Google Scholar
  21. [21]
    J. Bub, The Measurement Problem of Quantum Mechanics’, in G. Foraldo di Francia (ed.), Problems in the Foundations of Physics, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1979.Google Scholar
  22. [22]
    M. Jammer, The Philosophy of Quantum Mechanics, John Wiley, New York, 1974.Google Scholar
  23. [23]
    G. Birkhoff and J. von Neumann, ‘The Logic of Quantum Mechanics’, Annals of Mathematics 37 (1936), 823–843.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© D. Reidel Publishing Company 1981

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. L. Dalla Chiara
    • 1
  1. 1.Univeristy of FlorenceItaly

Personalised recommendations