Abstract
Scholars frequently consider the introduction of the axiomatic method and the deductive construction of mathematical theories in Ancient Greece as one of the greatest achievement of ancient thought. As is seen from the materials presented at the present conference, such an approach is viewed by the majority of participants as obvious, as a certain axiom, and the only points moot are various interpretations of the appearance and the early history of this method. The axiomatic method is regarded as typical of the general aspect of the scientific thinking of that time.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Knorr, W.: ‘On the early history of axiomatics,’ above pp. 145–186.
Bourbaki, N.: 1969, Eléments d’histoire des mathématiques, Hermann, Paris.
Yanovskaya, S.A.: 1972, S.A.: 1972, ‘On the history of axiomatics’, in: S.A. Yanovskaya, Methodological Problems of Science, Publ. House “Mysl”, Moscow, pp. 150–180.
Neugebauer, O.: 1968, The Exact Sciences in Antiquity, Publ. House “Fizmatigiz”, Moscow.
Yushkevich, A.P., (ed.): 1970, The History of Mathematics Vol. 1, Publishing House “Nauka”, Moscow.
Hilbert, D.: 1930, Uber das Zahlbegriff’, in Grundlagender der Geometrie, Teubner, Leipzig u. Berlin, pp. 241–46.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1980 D. Reidel Publishing Company
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Medvedev, F.A. (1980). On The Role of Axiomatic Method in the Development of Ancient Mathematics. In: Hintikka, J., Gruender, D., Agazzi, E. (eds) Theory Change, Ancient Axiomatics, and Galileo’s Methodology. Synthese Library, vol 145. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-9045-6_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-9045-6_15
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-009-9047-0
Online ISBN: 978-94-009-9045-6
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive