The Empirical Semantics of Key Terms, Phrases and Sentences

Empirical Semantics Applied to Non-Professional Language
  • A. Naess
Part of the Synthese Library book series (SYLI, volume 143)


In what follows I will not discuss every sort of empirical semantics, but a kind or trend that has been given the proper name Empirical Semantics and has mainly flourished in Scandinavia. Its characteristics are most easily grasped by contrasting it with other trends.


Ordinary Language Social Anthropology Logical Empiricist Professional Philosopher Total Class 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Blom, Siri: 1955, ‘Concerning a Controversy on the Meaning of Probability’ Theoria 21.Google Scholar
  2. Christophersen, J. A.: 1967, The Meaning of ‘Democracy’ as Used in European Ideologies from the French to the Russian Revolution, Universitetsforlaget, Oslo.Google Scholar
  3. Dahl, Ottar: 1956, Om årsaksproblemer i historisk forskning, Oslo.Google Scholar
  4. Fløistad, G. and A. Naess: 1963–1964, Spinoza’s Etikk: Systematiske rekonstruksjoner, I, II, III, Inst. of Philosophy, Oslo.Google Scholar
  5. Gullvaåg, I: 1951, ‘Definiteness of Intention’, Filosofiske Problemer, No. 18.Google Scholar
  6. Gullvaåg, I: 1954, ‘Criteria of Meaning and Analysis of Usage’, Synthese 9.Google Scholar
  7. Løvestad, L.L 1945, Bidrag til en metodelaere for de eksakte naturvidenskaper, Filosofiske Problemer, No. 3.Google Scholar
  8. McKeon, R. (ed.): 1951, Democracy in a World of Tensions, University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  9. Nordenstam, Åke: 1961, Empiricism and the Analytic-Synthetic Distinction, Gørteborg.Google Scholar
  10. Naess, A. (also written Ness): 1938. ‘Common-sense and Truth’ Theoria 4.Google Scholar
  11. Naess, A.: 1938. ‘Truth’ as Conceived by Those Who Are Not Professional Philosophers, Oslo.Google Scholar
  12. Naess, A.: 1949, ‘Toward a Theory of Interpretation and Preciseness’, Theoria 15,220–241. Also in Lindsky, L. (ed.), Semantics and the Philosophy of Language, Univ. of Illinois Press, 1952.Google Scholar
  13. Naess, A.: 1953, Interpretation and Preciseness. A Contribution to the Theory of Communication. Der Norske viendenskapsakademi i Oslo, skrifter, II Hist.-filos.kl, 1953:1, Oslo, 1953.Google Scholar
  14. Naess, A.: 1956, Democracy, Ideology and Objectivity, Studies in the Semantics and Cognitive Analysis of Ideological Controversy, ed. by Arne Naess, Jens A. Christophersen and Kiell Kyalø, Oslo.Google Scholar
  15. Naess, A.: 1966, Communication and Argument, Elements of Applied Semantics, Transl. from the Norwegian by Alastair Hannay, Oslo.Google Scholar
  16. Naess, A.: 1968, ‘Demokratisk styreform’, Filosofiske Problemer, No. 36, Mimeo.Google Scholar
  17. Naess, A.: 19, ‘Logical Equivalence, Intentional Isomorphism and Synonymity as Studied by Questionnaires’, Synthese 10.Google Scholar
  18. Naess, A.: 1975, Freedom, Emotion and Self subsistence, The Structure of a Central Part of Spinoza’s Ethics, Oslo.Google Scholar
  19. Ofstad, H.: 1950, ‘The Descriptive of the Concept “Legal Norm” as Proposed by Hans Kelsen’, Theoria 16.Google Scholar
  20. Ofstad, H.: 1961, An Inquiry into the Freedom of Decision, Oslo.Google Scholar
  21. Simonsson, T.: 1966, ‘Begreppen ‘tro’. En empirisk-semantisk studie’, Filosofiske Problemer, No. 29.Google Scholar
  22. Tejde, Jan Olav, 1966, ‘Om värdetermer i religiöst språk’, Filosofiske Problemer, No. 33.Google Scholar
  23. Tennessen, H.: 1949a, ‘“Private Enterprise”, A Semantical Study’, in The Psychological and Sociological Implications of Economic Planning in Norway, Mimeo, Oslo.Google Scholar
  24. Tennessen, H.: 1949b, ‘Typebegreper I, II’, Filisofiske Problemer, No.2.Google Scholar
  25. Tennessen, H.: 1959, ‘What Should We SAy?’, Inquiry 2.Google Scholar
  26. Tennessen, H.: 1964, Language Analysis and Empiricial Semantics, Eighteen Papers, Univ. of Alberta.Google Scholar
  27. Tennessen, H.: 1965, ‘Ordinary Language in memoriam’, Inquiry 8.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© D. Reidel Publishing Company 1980

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. Naess

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations