Skip to main content

Metal-Insulator Transition in One-Dimensional Deformable Lattices

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: NATO Advanced Study Institutes Series ((ASIC,volume 54))

Abstract

Metal-insulator transition at 0 K in a one-dimensional classical deformable lattice (Peierls transition) is viewed through two complementary models which consider properly the discreteness of the lattice in the case of a Fermi wave-vector kF incommensurate with the reciprocal lattice vector. The electron-phonon interaction is represented in both models by the same parameter λ while the electron-electron interaction and the spin effects are neglected. The first model assumes the knowledge at each atom of the potential λV(x) with amplitude λ. This potential is created by the charge density wave (CDW) of the electronic distribution and produces the periodic lattice distortion (PLD) at the same wave-vector 2kF as the CDW. (The existence of the CDW and of the PLD was proved by Peierls). When 2kF is incommensurate with the reciprocal lattice wave-vector and when V(x) is an analytic function, a phase transition versus λ, occurs at λ = λc in the PLD, which transforms from a quasi-sinusoidal modulation for λ < λc into an array of equidistant and locked phase defects for λ > λc. This transition is represented by the breaking of analyticity of the PLD hull function. The zero frequency mode corresponding to the phase rotation of the PLD-CDW (phason or Frölich mode), which carries a current, locks at λ = λc and transforms the system from a metal into an insulator. If V is not differentiable enough, this transition does not exist and the system always remains insulating. The second model assumes that the PLD is known and submits the electrons to a quasi-periodic potential with Fermi and lattice periods. This potential is represented in a tight-binding model by a potential defined at site i by the periodic hull function λV(i) with the Fermi period 2π/2kF. For a particular analytic potential V(i) we show that a transition occurs versus λ: for λ < λc all the electrons are described by modulated plane waves with an analytic hull function,while for λ > λc all the electrons are exponentially localized. This transition induces also a metal-insulator transition.When the potential V is not differentiable enough, the electrons are expected to be always localized. On this basis we explain that the CDW and PLD hull functions must be both analytic or both discontinuous. A well-defined etal-insulator transition versus the electron-phonon coupling λ is expected. The conducting phase would then exhibit a Frölich mode with extended electronic wave functions and the insulating phase would consist in locked phase defects plus localized electrons. This last phase can be physically reinterpreted as a crystal of localized polarons superimposed onto the lattice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. W. Kohn in “Many Body Physics” Edited by C. de Witt and R. Balian, Gordon and Breach (1968)

    Google Scholar 

  2. S. Aubry, Application of the Kolmogorov-Arnold-Moser theorems to structure problems in condensed matter. International Workshop on “Intrinsic stochasticity in Plasmas” June 1979 Cargèse, To be published.

    Google Scholar 

  3. P.W. Anderson, Phys. Rev.109, 1492 (1958).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. S.N. Mott, Proc. Phys. Soc. (London) 62 416 (1949).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. R.E. Peierls, Quantum theory of Solids, Clarendon, Oxford (1955) p. 108.

    Google Scholar 

  6. J.Y. Dubois and J.P. Carton, J. de Physique 35, 371 (1974).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. H. Frolich, Proc. Roy. Soc. A223, 296 (1955).

    Google Scholar 

  8. J. Bardeen, L.N. Cooper and J.R. Schrieffer, Phys. Rev. 108 1175

    Google Scholar 

  9. Quasi-one dimensional conductors, Edited by S. Barisic, A. Bjelis, J.R. Cooper and B. Leontic, Lecture Notes in Physics Springer Verlag, Vol. 95 and 96 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  10. J. Bardeen, Solid State Comm. 13, 357 (1973).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. D. A1 lender, J.W. Bray and J. Bardeen, Phys. Rev. B 9, 119 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  12. P.A. Lee, T.M. Rice and P.W. Anderson, Phys. Rev. Lett. 31 462 (1973)..

    Google Scholar 

  13. S. Aubry “The new concept of transition by breaking of analyticity” In “Soliton and Condensed matter physics”, Edited A.R. Bishop and T. Schneider, Springer Verlag, Solid. State Sciences 8, 264 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  14. S. Aubry and G. André,”Analyticity breaking and Anderson localization in incommensurate lattices”. Colloquium on Group theoretical methods in physics, Kiriat: Anavim, Israel, March 1979, to be published by Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  15. G. Andre, Thesis (in preparation).

    Google Scholar 

  16. E.I. Dinaburg and Y.G. Sinai, Fundamental Analysis, 9, 279 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  17. M.J. Azbel, Soviet Mathematics 5, 1549 (1964)

    Google Scholar 

  18. D.R. Hofstadter, Phys. Rev. B14, 2239 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  19. S. Aubry,”Defectibility and Frustration in incommensurate structures. The devil’s stair case transformation”. Fourth European Meeting on Ferroelectricity, Portoroz, Yugoslavia, Sept. 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  20. E. Wigner, Trans. Far. Soc. 34, 678 (1938).

    Google Scholar 

  21. A.J. Epstein and J.S. Miller, Scientific American p. 48 (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  22. J.P. Pouget, S. Kahna, F. Desnoyer, R. Comes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 37, 347 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  23. J.P. Pouget, S. Kahna, F. Desnoyer, R. Comes, Emery, Phys. Rev. Lett. 37, 107 (1976).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. J. Hubbard, Proc. Roy. Soc. A 276, 238 (1963).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. J. Hubbard, Proc. Roy. Soc. 277, 237 (1964).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. E. Lieb and F.Y. Wu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 20, 1445 (1968).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. J.R. Cooper, Phys. Rev. B 19, 2404 (1979).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1980 D. Reidel Publishing Company

About this paper

Cite this paper

Aubry, S. (1980). Metal-Insulator Transition in One-Dimensional Deformable Lattices. In: Bardos, C., Bessis, D. (eds) Bifurcation Phenomena in Mathematical Physics and Related Topics. NATO Advanced Study Institutes Series, vol 54. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-9004-3_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-9004-3_10

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-009-9006-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-9004-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics