The Symmetry of Time And The Branch Hypothesis

  • Henry Mehlberg
  • Robert S. Cohen
Part of the Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science book series (BSPS, volume 19-2)


Reichenbach’s posthumous book about time’s arrow is the first detailed treatment of the philosophically significant and intriguing aspect of time referred to in Eddington’s striking metaphor. The philosophical issues implicit in time’s arrow failed to interest an impressive group of leading philosophers of this century who made important contributions to the understanding of other aspects of time (Bergson, Broad, Carnap, Cassirer, Russell, Schlick, and Whitehead). Of course, the problem of the direction of time was too challenging to have been completely disregarded by Reichenbach’s contemporaries. Some of them explored the same issue without using Reichenbach’s terminology. Instead of referring to the direction of time or to time’s arrow, they discussed ‘temporal unidirectionality’ (Zilsel [1927], p. 280ff), ‘temporal anisotropy’ (Mehlberg [1935], p. 171ff), ‘temporal asymmetry’ (Smart [1954], p. 79ff), or the ‘flow of time’ (Margenau [1954], p. 79ff). It is remarkable, however, that an investigator of Reichenbach’s stature should have dealt with the single issue of time’s arrow in a substantial book full of surprising ideas and of some equally surprising misunderstandings.


Newtonian Mechanic Philosophical Issue Temporal Anisotropy Unique Direction Philosophical Prob 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Copyright information

© D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, Holland 1980

Authors and Affiliations

  • Henry Mehlberg
  • Robert S. Cohen

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations