Abstract
This conference addresses the philosophical problem: Is there a logic of discovery? My paper deals with the following historical problems: Did scientists at the time of the Scientific Revolution believe there was a logic of discovery? If so, what was it? How, if at all, did it influence their scientific practice?
An earlier version of this paper was read at the Pittsburgh Colloquium in the History and Philosophy of Science, April 7, 1976.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Bibliography
Arnould, Antoine: 1662, The Art of Thinking: Port-Royal Logic. Page references are to the English translation, Bobbs-Merrill, Indianapolis, 1964.
Bacon, Francis: 1620, The New Organon. References are to the English translation from the Latin, Bobbs-Merrill, Indianapolis, 1960.
Crombie, A.C.: 1953, Robert Grosseteste and the Origins of Experimental Science: 1100 - 1700, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
Dolan, S.E.: 1950, ‘Resolution and Composition in Speculative and Practical Discourse’, Laval Theologique et Philosophique VI, 9–62.
Galen: 1969, On the Parts of Medicine, Malcolm Lyons (trans. ), Akademie-Verlag, Berlin.
Gassendi, Pierre: 1658, The Syntagma: Logic, English edition, Johnson Reprint Co., New York, 1972.
Gilbert, N. W.: 1960, Renaissance Concepts of Method, Columbia Univ. Press, New York, 1960.
Hall, A.R., M.B.: 1962, Unpublished Scientific Papers of Isaac Newton, Callaghan & Co., Chicago.
Hintikka, J., U. Remes: 1974, The Method of Analysis: Its Geometrical Origin and Its General Significance, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.
Juncker, J.: 1757, Elemens de Chymie, French translation by Demachy from 2nd Latin edition, Paris.
Lavoisier, A-L.: 1789, Elements of Chemistry, Kerr (trans.), Dover, New York, 1965.
Leicester, H.M., H.S. Klickstein: 1952, A Source Book in Chemistry: 1400-1900, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1952.
Macquer, P. J.: 1751, Elements of the Theory and Practice of Chemistry, trans, from 2nd French edition by Reid, London, 1764.
Macquer, P. J.: 1766,Dictionnaire de Chymie, Paris.
Newton, Isaac: 1684, Universal Arithmetick.
Newton, Isaac: 1730, Opticks, 4th edition, reprinted by Dover, New York, 1952.
Polya, G.: 1945, How to Solve It, Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton.
Randall, J. H.: 1962, The Career of Philosophy, Vol I: From the Middle Ages to the Enlightenment, Columbia Univ. Press, New York.
Regis, L.M.: 1948, ‘Analyse et synthese dans l’oeuvre de Saint Thomas’, Studia Mediaevalia, pp. 303–330.
Stahl, G.E.: 1716, Traité du Soufre, trans, by d’Holbach from 1716 German edition, Paris, 1766.
Stahl, G.E.: 1723, Traité des Sels, trans, by d’Holbach from 1723 German edition, Paris, 1771.
Szabó, A.K.: 1974, A.K.: 1974, ‘Working Backwards and Proving by Synthesis’, Appendix I to Hintikka and Remes (1974).
Wallace, William A.: 1959, The Scientific Methodology of Theodoric of Freiberg, The University Press, Friberg, Switzerland.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1980 D. Reidel Publishing Company
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Koertge, N. (1980). Analysis as a Method of Discovery During the Scientific Revolution. In: Nickles, T. (eds) Scientific Discovery, Logic, and Rationality. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol 56. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-8986-3_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-8986-3_4
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-277-1070-3
Online ISBN: 978-94-009-8986-3
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive