Skip to main content

Legal Conceptions of Mental Illness

  • Chapter
Mental Illness: Law and Public Policy

Part of the book series: Philosophy and Medicine ((PHME,volume 5))

Abstract

By attaching legal consequences to conduct, the law necessarily regards individuals as responsible agents. For example, in holding individuals civilly and/or criminally liable for actions harmful to others, the law necessarily presupposes that it applies to individuals who are responsible, in the sense of accountable, for their actions; in enforcing certain voluntary acts of individuals, as in the law of property, contracts, wills, or marriage, the law must presuppose that the agents whose acts they are, are responsible in the sense of being capable of looking out for their own best interests. Mental illness has for centuries been a concept dealt with by the law because it negates, in some way or another and to some degree, the basic postulate of responsibility on which the law rests.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  1. Ackermann, R. J.: 1972, Belief and Knowledge, Doubleday, Garden City, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Anscombe, G. E. M.: 1957, Intention, Cornell University Press, Ithaca.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Armstrong, D.: 1968, A Materialist Theory of the Mind, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Baier, K.: 1970, ‘Responsibility and Action’, in M. Brand (ed.), The Nature of Human Action, Scott Foresman and Co., Glenview, Illinois, pp. 100–116.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bazelon, D. L.: 1971, ‘New Gods for Old: “Efficient” Courts in a Democratic Society’, New York University Law Review 46, 658–659.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Becker, L. E.: 1973, ‘Durham Revisited’, Psychiatric Annals 3, 8.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bentham, J.: 1789, ‘Cases Unmeet for Punishment’, in An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation ( 1948: Hafner Press, New York ).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Biggs, J.: 1955, The Guilty Mind, Harcourt, Brace, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Boorse, C.: 1975, ‘On the Distinction between Disease and Illness’, Philosophy and Public Affairs 5, 49–68.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Braginsky, B. M., Braginsky, D.D. and Ring, K.: 1969, Methods of Madness: The Mental Hospital as a Last Resort, Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Busse, E. W.: 1972, ‘The Presidential Address: There Are Decisions to be Made’, American Journal of Psychiatry 129, 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Cohen, J. L.: 1955, ‘Teleological Explanations’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 51, 255–292.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Dennett, D. C.: 1969, Content and Consciousness, Humanities Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Dennett, D. C.: 1973, ‘Mechanism and Responsibility’, in T. Honderich (ed.), Essays on Freedom and Action, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London, pp. 157–185.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Diamond, B. L.: 1956, ‘Isaac Ray and the Trial of Daniel M’Naghten’, American Journal of Psychiatry 112, 651–656.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Donnelly, R. C., Goldstein, J., and Schwartz, R. D.: 1962, Criminal Law, Free Press of Glencoe, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Epstein, I. (ed.): 1935, Babylonian Talmud, Baba Kamma, Soncino Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Feinberg, J.: 1970, ‘What Is So Special About Mental Illness?’, in Doing and De-serving, Princeton University Press, Princeton, Chapter 11, pp. 272–292.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Fingarette, H.: 1967, On Responsibility, Basic Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Fingarette, H.: 1970, ‘The Perils of Powell: In Search of a Factual Foundation for the “Disease Concept of Alcoholism”’, Harvard Law Review 83, 793–812.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Fingarette, H.: 1972, ‘Insanity and Responsibility’, Inquiry 15, 6–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Fingarette, H.: 1972, The Meaning of Criminal Insanity, University of California Press, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Goldstein, A.: 1967, The Insanity Defense, Yale University Press, New Haven.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Group for the Advancement of Psychiatry: 1954, ‘Criminal Responsibility and Psychiatric Expert Testimony’, G.A.P. Report No. 26.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Hart, H. L. A.: 1968, Punishment and Responsibility, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Hart, H. L. A. and Honore, A. M.: 1959, Causation in the Law, Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Hempel, C.: 1965, ’The Logic of Functional Analysis’, in Aspects of Scientific Explanation, Free Press, New York, pp. 297–330.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Hinsie, L. E. and Campbell, R. J.: 1960, Psychiatric Dictionary, 3rd ed., Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Jellinek, E.: 1960, The Disease Concept of Alcoholism, Rutgers Center of Alcohol Studies Publications, New Brunswick, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Kendall, R. E.: 1974, ‘The Concept of Disease and its Implications for Psychiatry’, Inaugural Lecture, No. 57, University of Edinburgh; reprinted in 1975 in British Journal of Psychiatry 127, 305–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. King, L. S.: 1954, ‘What Is Disease?’, Philosophy of Science 21, 193–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Livermore, J. M. and Meehl, P. E.: 1967, ‘The Virtues of M’Naghten’, Minnesota Law Review 51, 789–856.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Model Penal Code, § 4.01 (Proposed Official Draft, 1962).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Moore, M. S.: 1975, ‘Mental Illness and Responsibility’, Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic 39, 308–328.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Moore, M. S.: 1975, ‘Some Myths About “Mental Illness”’,Inquiry 18, 223–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Moore, M. S.: 1978, ‘Definition of Mental Disorder’, in Robert L. Spitzer and Donald Klein (eds.), Critical Issues in Psychiatric Diagnosis, Raven Press, New York, pp. 85–104.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Mullane, H.: 1971, ‘Psychoanalytic Explanation and Rationality’, Journal of Philosophy 68, 413–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Nagel, E.: 1961, Structure of Science: Problems in the Logic of Scientific Explanation, Harcourt, Brace, and Jovanovich, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Packer, H.: 1968, The Limits of the Criminal Sanction, Stanford University Press, Stanford, California.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Piatt, A. and Diamond, B. L.: 1966, ‘The Origins of the “Right and Wrong” Test of Criminal Responsibility and Its Subsequent Development in the United States, an Historical Survey’, California Law Review 54, 1227–1260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Putnam, H.: 1962, ‘Dreaming and Depth Grammar’, in R. J. Butler (ed.), Analytical Philosophy, 1st series, Basil Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 36–48.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Putnam, H.: 1965, ‘Brains and Behavior’, in R. J. Butler (ed.), Analytical Philosophy, 2nd series, Basil Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Putnam, H.: 1966, ‘Minds and Machines’, in S. Hook (ed.), Dimensions of Mind, New York University Press, New York, pp. 148–179.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Putnam, H.: 1964, ‘Robots: Machines or Artificially Created Life?’, Journal of Philosophy 61, 668–691.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Ray, I.: 1838, A Treatise on the Medical Jurisprudence of Insanity, Little, Brown and Company, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Reid, J. P.: 1960, ‘The Working of the New Hampshire Doctrine of Criminal In-sanity’, University of Miami Law Review 15, 14–58.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Reik, T.: 1953, ‘The Doe-Ray Correspondence: A Pioneer Collaboration in the Jurisprudence of Mental Disease’, Yale Law Journal 63, 183–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Royal Commission on Capital Punishment 1959–53 Report, London, 1953, § 322.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Ryle, G.: 1949, The Concept of Mind, Barnes and Noble, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Select Pleas of the Crown, Volume I, Seiden Society, London, p. 30 (1887).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Skinner, B. F.: 1953, Science and Human Behavior, Free Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Skinner, B. F.: 1973, More About Behaviorism, Free Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Smart, J. J. C.: 1959, ‘Sensations and Brain Processes’, Philosophical Review 68, 141–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Spitzer, R. L. and Endicott, J.: 1978, ’Medical and Mental Disorder: Proposed Definition and Criteria’, in Robert L. Spitzer and Donald Klein (eds.), Critical Issues in Psychiatric Diagnosis, Raven Press, New York, pp. 15–39.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Star, S. A.: 1955, ‘The Public’s Idea About Mental Illness’, paper presented to the Annual Meeting of the National Association for Mental Health, Sheraton-Lincoln Hotel, Indianapolis, Indiana.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Stephen, J.: 1883, A History of the Criminal Law of England, Vol. 2, Macmillan, London.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Stone, A.: 1975, Mental Health and Law: A System in Transition, Center for Crime and Delinquency, National Institute of Mental Health, Rockville, Md., p. 226.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Swarz, L. H.: 1963, ‘Mental Disease, the Groundwork for Legal Analysis and Legislative Action’, University of Pennsylvania Law Review 111, 389–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Szasz, T.: 1958, ‘Psychiatry, Ethics and the Criminal Law’, Columbia Law Review 58, 183–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Szasz, T. S.: 1970, Ideology and Insanity, Doubleday, Garden City, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Taylor, F. K.: 1971, ‘A Logical Analysis of the Medico-Psychological Concept of Disease’, Psychological Medicine 1, 356–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Taylor, R.: 1965, Action and Purpose, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Von Wright, G. H.: 1963, The Varieties of Goodness, Humanities Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Waelder, R.: 1952, ‘Psychiatry and the Problem of Criminal Responsibility’, University of Pennsylvania Law Review 101, 378–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Watt, A. J.: 1972, ‘The Intelligibility of Wants’, Mind 81, 553–561.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Weihofen, H.: 1960, ‘The Definition of Mental Illness’, Ohio State Law Journal 21, 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Year Books of Edward II, Year Books Series, Vol. V, Seiden Society, London (1909).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1980 D. Reidel Publishing Company

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Moore, M.S. (1980). Legal Conceptions of Mental Illness. In: Brody, B.A., Engelhardt, H.T. (eds) Mental Illness: Law and Public Policy. Philosophy and Medicine, vol 5. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-8972-6_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-8972-6_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-009-8974-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-8972-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics