Skip to main content

Yes-No Questions as Wh-Questions

  • Chapter
Book cover Speech Act Theory and Pragmatics

Part of the book series: Texts and Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy ((SLAP,volume 10))

Abstract

In this paper I am going to discuss some types of yes-no questions which — under normal circumstances — cannot be answered equally well by a plain ‘yes’ or a plain ‘no’. My account of these questions will principally be based on the theory of indirect speech acts and the theory of conversation.

The work reported here was carried out within the framework of the cooperation between the Institute for Information Sciences (KVAL), Stockholm and the Institute of Linguistics, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Budapest.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Davison, A.: 1975, ‘Indirect Speech Acts and What to Do with Them,’ Syntax and Semantics 3, pp. 143–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grice, H. P.: 1975, ‘Logic and Conversation,’ Syntax and Semantics 3, pp. 43–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiss, E.: 1977, ‘Topic and Focus in Hungarian Syntax,’ Montreal Working Papers in Linguisticsy Vol. 8, pp. 1–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • König, P.: 1977, ‘Form und Funktion. Eine funktionale Betrachtung ausgewählter Bereiche des Englischen,’ Niemeyer: Tübingen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moravcsik, P.: 1971, ‘Some Cross-linguistic Generalizations about Yes-no Questions and their Answers,’ Working Papers on Language Universals 7, pp. 45–193, Stanford, California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pope, P. N.: 1976, ‘Questions and Answers,’ Mouton: The Hague.

    Google Scholar 

  • Searle, J. R.: 1975, ‘Indirect Speech Acts,’ Syntax and Semantics 3, pp. 59–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Searle, J. R.: 1976, ‘A Classification of Illocutionary Acts,’ Language in Society 5, pp. 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wikberg, K.: ‘Yes-no Questions and Answers in Shakespeare’s Plays,’ A Study in Text Linguistics, Acta Academiae Aboensis, Ser. A, Vol. 51, No. 1, Åbo Akademi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wunderlich, D.: 1976, ‘Studien zur Sprechakttheorie,’ Suhrkamp: Frankfurt am Main.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1980 D. Reidel Publishing Company

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kiefer, F. (1980). Yes-No Questions as Wh-Questions. In: Searle, J.R., Kiefer, F., Bierwisch, M. (eds) Speech Act Theory and Pragmatics. Texts and Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy, vol 10. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-8964-1_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-8964-1_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-277-1045-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-8964-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics