Skip to main content

An Attempt at a New Solution for the Enigma of the Meaning of False Sentences

  • Chapter
  • 78 Accesses

Part of the book series: Synthese Library ((SYLI,volume 98))

Abstract

At first glance, the question ‘What is the meaning of false sentences?’ looks like a pseudo-question, much like the parallel question ‘What is the meaning of true sentences?’, against which Ayer objected that it presupposes that all sentences mean the same. But it is possible to interpret these questions differently. The person who asks them does not necessarily seeks a single correlate as the meaning of all false sentences. He may rather be preoccupied with the question to which category of reality the correlates of true and — if they exist — false sentences belong. Formulated in this way, my question is not founded on absurd presuppositions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. B. Russell, An Inquiry into Meaning and Truth, Allen and Unwin, London, 1940, reprinted 1966, p. 189.

    Google Scholar 

  2. G. Ryle, ‘Are there Propositions?’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, XXX (1929-1930) 122.

    Google Scholar 

  3. A. J. Ayer, Thinking and Meaning, H. K. Lewis, London, p. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ryle, Op. cit., p. 120.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ryle, Ibid., p. 121.

    Google Scholar 

  6. M. Schlick, Gesammelte Aufsätze (1921–1936) p. 153, quoted by F. Waissmann, The Principles of Linguistic Philosophy, Harre (ed.), MacMillan, London, 1965, p. 305.

    Google Scholar 

  7. F. Vandamme, ‘Le nominalisme et la proposition’, Communication and Cognition (1977) 88.

    Google Scholar 

  8. M. J. Cresswell, ‘Semantic Competence’, in F. Guenthner and M. Guenthner-Reutter (eds.), Meaning and Translation, Duckworth, 1978, p. 12.

    Google Scholar 

  9. W. V. O. Quine, ‘Roots of Reference’, 1973, Open Court, La Salle, Illinois, p. 265.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Quine, Ibid., p. 265.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Quine, Ibid., p. 265.

    Google Scholar 

  12. F. Waissmann, The Principles of Linguistic Philosophy, Harre (ed.), MacMillan, 1965, p. 286.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1980 D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, Holland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gochet, P. (1980). An Attempt at a New Solution for the Enigma of the Meaning of False Sentences. In: Outline of a Nominalist Theory of Propositions. Synthese Library, vol 98. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-8949-8_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-8949-8_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-009-8951-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-8949-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics