Abstract
Now that we have surveyed the philosophical disciplines where the concept of the proposition plays a role, we must answer a critical question which our method prevented us from asking: what is the criterion of identity, the principle of individuation, for propositions?
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
W. V. O. Quine, Word and Object, Wiley, New York, 1960, p. 200.
Quine, Ibid., p. 200.
A. N. Prior, ‘Is the Concept of Referential Opacity Really Necessary?’, Acta Philos. Fennica, 1963, p. 190–191.
B. Russell, Inquiry into Meaning and Truth, p. 166.
F. de Saussure, Cours de Linguistique générale, 1915, 3d edn. 1962, p. 160.
M. Leroy, ‘Le Binarisme, concept moteur de la linguistique’, Mélanges de Linguistique, de philologie et de méthodologie de l’enseignement des langues anciennes, offerts à M. René Fohalle, J. Duculot (éd.), 1969, p. 6.
N. Goodman, ‘On Likeness of Meaning’, Analysis (1949-50), reprinted in Macdonald M., Philosophy and Analysis, Oxford Blackwell, 1954.
N. Goodman, ‘On Some Differences about Meaning’, Analysis (1952-53) reprinted in Macdonald, Ibid.
A. Naess, ‘Synonymity as Revealed by Intuitic’, Philosophical Review 66, (1957) 87–93.
M. Pêcheux, Analyse automatique du discours, Dunod, Paris, 1969, p. 30.
R. Carnap, Meaning and Necessity, Phoenix Books, Chicago, 1956, p. 56.
Carnap, Ibid., p. 25.
A. N. Whitehead and B. Russell, Principia Mathematica to* 56, Cambridge University Press, 1962, p. 401.
A. Church, Introduction to Mathematical Logic, Princeton, 1956, p. 25.
G. E. M. Anscombe, ‘Causality and Extensionality’, Journal of Philosophy (1969) 152.
A. Church, ‘Carnap’s Introduction to Semantics’, Philosophical Review 52, (1943) 299.
W. V. O. Quine, Three Grades of Modal Involvement’ (1953), The Ways of Paradox, Random House (1966), p. 162.
D. Føllesdal, ‘Quine on Modality’, in Synthese 19, (1968) 154.
D. Føllesdal, p. 180.
E. J. Lemmon, ‘Sentences, Statements and Propositions’, in B. Williams and A. Montefiore (eds.), in British Analytical Philosophy, Routledge and Kegan, London, 1966, p. 103.
M. Mleziva, ‘Problem fakt u logicke Semantice’, Theorie a Metoda, 1, (1969) 74.
W. V. O. Quine, Word and Object, p. 205.
P. Suppes, ‘Congruence in Meaning’, Presidential address delivered at the Forty- seventh Annual Meeting or the Pacific Division of the American Philosophical Association, 1973, p. 26–27.
W. V. O. Quine, Word and Object, p. 27.
W. V. O. Quine, Ibid., p. 206.
W. V. O. Quine, From a Logical Point of View, 1953, Harper and Row, 1960, p. 63.
W. V. Quine, ‘Replies’, Synthese (1968) 275.
I. Young, ‘Rabbits’, Philosophical Studies 23, (1972) 180.
K. Schick, ‘Indeterminacy of Translation’, Journal of Philosophy 69, (1972) 830.
W. V. O. Quine, Word and Object, p. 70.
D. Føllesdal, ‘Indeterminacy of translation and underdetermination of the theory of nature’, Dialéctica 27, (1973) 5.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1980 D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, Holland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gochet, P. (1980). The Identification Criterion for Propositions. In: Outline of a Nominalist Theory of Propositions. Synthese Library, vol 98. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-8949-8_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-8949-8_10
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-009-8951-1
Online ISBN: 978-94-009-8949-8
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive