Abstract
As we have seen in Chapter 9, the stagnation-prone factors by which a number of continuities were maintained were very strong. It was inevitable, however, that this should alter as factors evolved which were to intensify social contradictions, in spite of all the channelizing power still left in traditional structures and trends. As against Ben-da’s undue stress on the all too global aspects of continuity, Levine strongly emphasises the aspect of change although he presents it in a somewhat too elementary fashion.1 Therefore it is well-nigh impossible to fathom the correct influence of continuity and change in the overall historical process dealing with the slow development of social contrasts in Indonesia in all their reciprocal and yet contradictory facets. As we have seen in the preceding chapter, the influence of foreign capital in Indonesia,2 in spite of fluctuations and interruptions was, and is, a strong — if not the strongest — stagnatory factor. At the same time foreign capital is also capable of bringing about a most dynamic force: that of change, an element which foreign capital introduces inter alia through:
-
1.
penetration of the money economy to the farthest parts of the interior;
-
2.
development of the production and circulation of market commodities (this occurs from the local level up to and including the high level of integration into the world market processes, albeit with all their attendant fluctuations);
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Levine , ‘History’, in: Indonesia, 7 April 1969, pp. 5–19.
Allen and Donnithorne, Western Enterprise; Boeke, Economic, Boeke, Evolution; Burger, De ontsluiting; Furnivall, Netherlands Indies; Sitzen, Industrial Development; Rutgers, Indonesië; Conggrijp, Schets; Brook, Economic Development; Paauw, ‘From Colonial to Guided Economy’, in: Indonesia, pp. 155–247. Further, the regular ‘Survey of Recent Developments’, in: BIES since 1956.
Kat Angelino, Staatkundig beleid, II; Gedenkboek van Nederlandsch-Indië; Nederlandsch-Indië; Hecht verbonden; Wat Indië ontving en schonk; Balans van een beleid. Further: Vlekke, Nusantara; Effects of Western influence; Wertheim, Indonesian Society; Bastin and Benda, A History; Benda, Continuity. For educational affairs: Brugmans, Geschiedenis van het onderwijs;Het ondermjsbeleid.
Van Niel, Emergence, Ch. 2.
For the economy in the years 1945–1949 see: Sutter, Indonesianisasi, III. For the revolution: Kahin, Nationalism, Ch. 5 ff; Wehl, Birth of Indonesia; Anderson, Pemuda Revolution.
For the 1955–57 elections see: Feith, Indonesian Elections of 1955, passim; Hering and Willis, Indonesian General Election, app. II. For the abrupt rise of the PKI see: Feith, Decline, Ch. 9 ff; Lev, Transition: Hindlev. Communist Partv
Paauw, ‘From Colonial to Guided Indonesia’, in: Indonesia, pp. 157 ff.
Peper, Grootte en groei, pp. 117–118. For a critique on Peper: Wertheim, ‘Critisch com-mentaar’, in: Id., pp. 136–142. Further: Nitisastio, Population Trends, Ch. 9 ff. See also: the review of this book by Glassburner, in: Indonesia, 10 Oct. 1970, pp. 183–189.
Pelzer, ‘Physical and Human Resource Pattern’, in: Indonesia, pp. 13 ff.
See Chs 4 and 9 (on pluralism).
Fisher, Southeast Asia, pp. 263 ff. For the transition from a Javano-centric view among the rising intelligentsia on Java towards conceptions of Indonesian unity: Blumberger, De nationalistische beweging, pp. 197 ff, 396 ff.
Burger, Structuurveranderingen, III. According to Wertheim, Muslim-Chinese competition started rather late; that is, with the emergence of a new class of Muslim entrepreneurs at the end of the nineteenth century: Wertheim, ‘Trading Minorities’, in: East-West Parallels, pp. 76 ff. After 1900 everywhere in Southeast Asia anti-Chinese campaigns started within the context of ‘a gradual breaking down of traditional occupational dividing lines’. Van Niel, Emergence, pp. 85 ff.
Geertz, Islam, pp. 6 7 ff.
Schrieke, ‘Causes and Effects of Communism’, in: Sociological Studies, I, pp. 128–129. Mededelingen omtrent enkele onderwerpen, 1920, pp. 6 ff; Koch, Verantwoording, pp. 108–115.
Van Mook, ‘Kuta Gede’, in: Indonesian Town, pp. 287 ff.
Kat Angelino, Batik rapport, 3 Vols; Soerachman, Het Batikbedriff; Darmawan Mangoen-koesoema, Bifdrage tot de kennis van de kretekstrootfes Industrie. See also the older work of: Rouffaer, De voornaamste industrieen. Further: Onderzoek naar de mindere welvaart; Huender, Overzicht; Verslag van den economischen toestand der Inlandsche bevolking, 2 Vols; Zeilinger, Kapitaal. Indirect data in entrepreneurial activities in the various areas are also to be found in the literature on popular credit (Cramer and Djojohadikusumo) on tax burdens and labour relations.
See the works of: Snouck Hurgronje; Id., De Atjehers; Id., Ambtelijke adviezen. For criticism of Snouck: Siegel, Rope of God (unsatisfactory); Wertheim, Elite, pp. 184–185; van ’t Veer, De Atjeh-oorlog, pp. 190, 250–251, 297–298; Benda, ‘Christiaan Snouck Hurgronje’, in: Continuity, pp. 90 ff.
Geertz, Peddlers, pp. 28 ff; Id., Social History, pp. 89, 94; Castles, Religion. See also: Hawkins, Batik Industry and Higgins, ‘Introduction’, in: Entrepreneurship, pp. 39–74; Palmer and Castles, ‘Textile Industry’, in: Economy of Indonesia, pp. 315 ff. See also: Kuntowidjojo, ‘Economic and Religious Attitude’, in: Indonesia, 12, Oct. 1971, pp. 47–55 (metal producers in Klaten).
Taufik Abdullah, ‘Modernization in the Minangkabau World’, in: Culture and Politics, pp. 179–245; Id., ‘Adat and Islam’, in: Indonesia, 2 Oct. 1966, pp. 1 ff; Hendra Esmara, ‘An Economic Survey’, in: BIES, VII, 1, March 1971, pp. 32–55. See also: BIES, V, 1, March 1969, pp. 34 ff (North Sumatra); Id., X, 2, July 1974, pp. 35–55 (Aceh). Compare for the other Outer Islands: BIES, V, 2, July 1969, pp. 17–59 (South Sulawesi); Id., X, 3, Nov. 1974, pp. 26–53 (West Kalimantan).
Geertz, Social History, pp. 39 ff. 49 ff. 87–106.
De landbouw, I, pp. 409 ff; Pelzer, ‘Agricultural Foundations’, in: Indonesia, pp. 147 11; Paauw, ‘From Colonial to Guided Economy’, in: Id., p. 160; Allen and Donnithorne, Western Enterprise, pp. 120 ff.
Wertheim, Indonesian Society, pp. 143 ff.
Sutter, Indonesianisasi, pp. 58–59, 1238 ff and passim; Paauw, ‘From Colonial to Guided Economy’, in: Indonesia, p. 179.
Id., pp. 220 ff; Castles, ‘Fate of the Private Entrepreneur’, in: Sukarno’s Guided Indonesia, pp. 73–88.
For the new economic policy in general: Panglaykim and Thomas, ‘New Order’, in: Indonesia, 3, pp. 73–120; Palmer, Indonesian Economy.
Utrecht, Nieuwe orde, p. 98; Economy of Indonesia, pp. 331 ff; BIES, V, 3, Nov. 1969, pp. 47; Id., VIII, 3, Nov. 1972, pp. 31–32; Id., IX, 1, March 1973, pp. 9–10, 22–23; Id., XI, 2, July 1975, p. 21; Id., XII, 3, Nov. 1976, p. 34; Id., XIV, 1, March 1978, p. 21; HAI, pp. 79–80; Palmer,Indonesian Economy, pp. 66, 77, 97, 154–155, 156, 167 ff, 175.
Robison, ‘Toward a Class Analysis’, in: Indonesia, 25, April 1978, pp. 17–39.
BIES, VIII, 1, March 1972, p. 24; Palmer, Indonesian Economy, pp. 105 ff.
McGee, Southeast Asian City; Population of Southeast Asia, pp. 46–47; Indonesian Town, pp. 1 ff; Wertheim, Indonesian Society, pp. 170–194; Fryer, Emerging Southeast Asia, pp. 77–98; Indonesia, pp. 19 ff, 38 ff, 202 ff. In 1930 the urban population of Java/ Madura and the other Islands amounted to 8,9% and 5,2% of the total population.
Volkstelling 1930, VIII, tables 18; Sitzen, Industrial Development, pp. 5, 39, 41, 56. The percentage of industrial workers in the urban population of Southeast Asia is still remarkably low, as against the high percentage of employees in the service sector. McGee, Southeast Asian City, p. 88. This phenomenom is part of the pseudo-urbanization of the Third World. Id., p. 17.
Sensus penduduk 1961 seluruh Indonesia, p. 1.
Report on the Labour Force Sample Survey; Hawkins, ‘Labor’, in: Indonesia, pp. 251–253.
Sundrum, ‘Manufacturing Employment’, in: BIES, IX, 1, March 1975, p. 59; Sensus penduduk 1961, p. 32.
For more recent figures: Sundrum, ‘Manufacturing Employment’, in: BIES, XV, 1, March 1979, p. 126.
Sundrum, Id., pp. 61 ff.
Castles, Religion, pp. 53 ff.
Economy of Indonesia, p. 251.
Hawkins, ‘Labor’, in: Economy of Indonesia, p. 249; Hawkins, ‘Labor’, in: BIES, II, Oct. 1968, pp. 26–27. Arndt estimates in 1968 3 to 4,000,000 unemployed and 12 to 14,000,000 partially unemployed.
Hawkins, ‘Labor’, in: BIES, 11, Oct. 1968, pp. 27–28. Further: HAI, p. 57;
Palmer, Indonesian Economy, pp. 189–190; Hawkins, ‘Labor’, in: BIES, IX, 3, Nov. 1975, p. 17.
Parsudi Suparlan, ‘Gelandangan of Jakarta’, in: Indonesia, 18, Oct. 1974, pp. 41–52.
Geertz, Social History, pp. 106 ff.
Van Niel, Emergence, pp. 23 ff, 50 ff, 76 ff. See also: Het onderwifsbeleid, pp. 693–700.
Palmier, ‘Javanese Nobility’, in: CSSH, II, 2, Jan. 1960, pp. 197–227. Palmier’s concept of ‘nobility’ (partially borrowed from Burger) is too broad for the 20th century; the comparison with Mexico is totally irrelevant. See also: Nagazumi, Budi Utomo, pp. 12 ff.
Id., Chs II ff; van Niel, see: note 40; Geertz, Religion, pp. 235 ff; Geertz, Sociial History, pp. 78–86, 121 ff. The rise of abangan elements through modern education was stimulated by the lack of priyayi interests (at the beginning of the 20th century) in Western education other than the schools for Indonesian civil servants. Ontwikkeling van het geneeskundig onderwij’s, p. 43.
Burger, ‘Structuurveranderingen, III, De bovendorpse sfeer’, in: Indonesia, III, pp. 103 ff; Verslag van de commissie tot bestudering van staatsrechtelijke hervormingen, I, pp. 71–72; Wertheim, Indonesian Society, p. 147; Geertz, Social History, p. 122. Selosoemardjan (Social Changes, pp. 128 ff) exaggerates when he speaks of the old priyayi class being driven out by the new intelligentsia. With this line of thought the convergence of both sectors in the Japanese period and the revolution would then be un-explainable. Sometimes, and in colonial times as well, conservative civil servants and nationalist priyayis would not always harm each other. Dioiohadikusumo, Herinneringen, pp. 97 ff. For the spectacular rise of one priyayi see Dahm, Sukarno: Soekarno’s Mentjapai Indonesia Merdeka, ed. Hering, the latter analyses one of Soekarno’s most important writings of the early 1930s, while it also provides for an interesting background by presenting some important documents of the same period.
McVey, ‘Postrevolutionary Transformation, II’, in: Indonesia, 13, April 1972, pp. 147 ff; van Doom, Orde, pp. 66–73; Crouch, Army, pp. 34 ff. Van Doom (Orde, pp. 76–77) mentions the parallel between the present military-bureaucratic combination and the colonial co-ordination and subordination of Dutch and Indonesian civil services.
Id., pp. 76–77.
It took some time before the development of the military/civilian bureaucracy became an object of study. At first attention was drawn to the ‘technocrats’. See: ‘Berkeley Mafia’, in: Ramparts, 9, 4, Oct. 1970, pp. 27–29, 40–44; corruption (Smith, ‘Corruption’, in: Indonesia, 11, April 1971, pp. 63–94;
Mackie, ‘Commission of Four’, in: BIES, VI, 3 Nov. 1970, pp. 87–101) and Ibnu Sutowo and his Pertamina.
Somewhat later other aspects were dealt with Rieffel and Wirjasaputrai, ‘Military Enterprise’, in: BIES, VIII, 2, July 1972, pp. 104–108; Mortimer, ‘Indonesian Army’, in: Showcase State, pp. 88 ff; Crouch, Army, pp. 273 ff;
Robison, ‘Toward a Class Analysis’, in: Indonesia, 25, April, 1978, pp. 17–39.
Feith provides an idea of the national political elite in the years 1949–57: Decline, pp. 101 ff. See also: Anderson, Java, pp. 65–66.
See for example: Taufik Abdullah, ‘Adat and Islam’, in: Indonesia, 2, Oct. 1966, pp. 13 ff (Padri war); van ’t Veer, De Atjeh-oorlog.
Alfian, Islamic Modernism, pp. 388 ff; Noer, Modernist Muslim Movement’, Federspiel, ‘Muhammedijah’, in: Indonesia, 10, Oct. 1970, pp. 51–59; Id., Peratuan Islam.
Feith, Decline, pp. 178, 236; Id., Indonesian Election, p. 79. The traditionalist kolot wing of Islam has attracted less scholarly attention than the ‘modern’ sector. For Java: Geertz, ‘Javanese Kijaji’, in: CSSH, II, 2, Jan. 1960, pp. 228–249.
For the Priangan in general: ENI, III, pp. 503–508; de Haan, Priangan, I, III, pp. 212, 215 ff; van Vollenhoven, Het adatrecht, I, pp. 695 ff; Burger, De ontsluiting, pp. 13–15, 159; Palmer, ‘Sundanese Village’, in: Local, Ethnic and National Loyalties, pp. 42–51. Further: Smail, Bandung, pp. 6 ff; Anderson, Java, pp. 17–20, 233 ff; McVey, ‘Postrevol-utionary, I’, in: Indonesia, II, April 1971, p. 161;
Id., II, in: Id., 13, April 1972, pp. 152–153; Feith, Decline, pp. 113 ff; Id., Indonesian Elections, pp. 67 ff. As a result of inter-ethnic marriage there was ‘considerable cultural homogeneity’. Feith, Decline, pp. 108–109.
Crouch, Indonesian Army, pp. 275 ff.
Robison, ‘Toward a Class Analysis’, in: Indonesia, 25, April 1978, pp. 18 ff.
Indonesian middle classes have not yet been studied. An impression is given by Anderson in his ‘Notes’, in: Indonesia.
For the 19th century an important source is: Eindresume by W.B. Bergsma (1876, 1880, 1896).
For the decline in the share of agriculture in the gross national product: Paauw, ‘From Colonial to Guided Economy’, in: Indonesia, p. 195; Arndt, ‘Survey’, in: BIES, XIII, 3, Nov. 1977, p. 24.
Burger, De ontsluiting.
Van Vollenhoven, Het adatrecht, I, pp. 524–526; Pelzer, Pioneer Settlement, pp. 165 ff. See also: Villages, pp. 266–267.
Hsisselman, Algemeen overzicht, pp. 36 ff.
Van Vollenhoven, Het adatrecht, I, pp. 697 ff; Id., De Indonesiër, p. 5; Villages, pp. 303 ff; Kern, ‘Priangsche toestanden’, in: Indische Gids 1904, pp. 1816 ff. See also: note 51. For present differences between West Java and the rest of Java: Sajogyo, Modernization, pp. 14 ff, 28 ff.
Meyer-Ranneft and Huender, Onderzoek naar den belastingdruk, p. 10.
Rapport van de Commissie van onderzoek, II, pp. 19–22.
Rutgers, Indonesie, p. 119.
Geertz, Agricultural Involu tion, p. 120.
Booth, ‘Ipeda’, in: BIES, X, 1, March 1974, pp. 63 ff.
For this regional division, agrarian data (Eindresume; Onderzoek naar de mindere wel-vaart; Landbouwatlas van Java en Madoera; De landbouw in den Indischen archipel, 4 Vol.) as well as those of the adat law regions can be utilized. Van Vollenhoven, Het adatrecht, I, pp. 133 ff; Id., De Indonesiër, pp. 5 ff; ter Haar, Adat Law, pp. 5–10. For East Java: van Vollenhoven, Het adatrecht, I, p. 509; this author mentions ‘others’ who prefer to limit East Java to Surabaya, Pasuruan and Besuki, that is, to the Pasisir. An interesting regional study is: Harvey, Tradition.
Ten Dam, ‘Cooperation’, in: Indonesian Economics, pp. 345–382; Ina Slamet, Dorpssamenleving; Utrecht, De onderbroken revolutie, Chs 5 ff. See also: Lyon, Bases of Conflict in Rural Java.
Utrecht, De onderbroken revolutie, pp. 3940, 264.
Id., pp. 238 ff, 262.
Collier, etc., ‘Recent Changes’, in: BIES, IX, 2, July 1973, pp. 3645; Widya Utami and Ihalauw, ‘Some Consequences’, in: Id., pp. 46–56; Timmer, ‘Choice of Technique’, in: Id., pp. 57–76;
Collier, etc., ‘Choice’, in: Id., X, 1, March 1974, pp. 105–120; Timmer, ‘Reply’, in: Id., pp. 121–126; Utrecht, De onderbroken revolutie, p. 151; Penny and Singarimbun, Population and Poverty, HAI, pp. 38 ff, 51 ff;
Hickson, ‘Rural Development’, in: JCA, 5, 3, 1975, pp. 327 ff;
Hickson, ‘Rural Development’, in: BIES, XIII, 1, March 1977, p. 108;
Id., 3, Nov. 1977, pp. 96–97;
Bryant, Population Pressure, pp. 360–361. Booth and Sundrum, ‘1973 Census’, in: BIES, XII, 2, July 1976, pp. 91–105.
Penny and Singarimbun, ‘Case Study’, in: BIES, VIII, 1, March 1972, pp. 79–88;
Booth, ‘Landownership’, in: Id., X, 3, Nov. 1974, pp. 135–140.
Sajogyo, Modernization without Development, pp. 37–51.
BIES, IX, 2, July 1973, p. 38, n. 3. See also: Sajogyo, Modernization, pp. 38, 3940.
It would be useful to investigate whether Geertz’s paradigm (Geertz, Social History, p. 140) for the abangan-priyayi-santri triad (applied in the early 1950s) should be revised.
For the alirans see: Chs II ff; but also: Hindley, ‘Alirans and the Fall of the Old Order’, in: Indonesia, 9, April 1970, pp. 23–66;
Hering, ‘Alirans’, in: Courrier de lExtreme Orient, 7, 1973, pp. 47–55.
Anderson, ‘Notes’, in: Indonesia, 16, Oct. 1973, p. 79.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1980 Martinus Nijhoff Publishers bv, The Hague
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Tichelman, F. (1980). Changes. In: The Social Evolution of Indonesia. Studies in Social History, vol 5. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-8896-5_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-8896-5_11
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-009-8898-9
Online ISBN: 978-94-009-8896-5
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive