Abstract
Prior to the introduction of the Cu-7-200 and the Cu-T200 IUDs, the small plastic devices, Lippes Loop, Saf-T-Coil and Dalkon Shield, were not accepted as well by nulliparous women as by parous women, there being higher rates of pregnancy, and of expulsion and removal due to bleeding and pain. Results obtained in nulliparous women with the Cu-7s and Cu-Ts were only marginally different from those achieved in parous women with respect to expulsion and removals for bleeding and pain. The pregnancy rate with copper IUDs does not differ between nulliparous and parous women. The controversy lies in the possible effect that the copper IUDs may have on the future fertility of the young nullipara who chooses the IUD as her method of contraception. Nobody will dispute the fact that pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) is more frequent in nulliparous IUD wearers compared to women using other methods of contraception (Westrom et al. 1976).
The use of copper intrauterine devices in nulliparous women remains a controversial topic.
Editorial, British Medical Journal, 22 July 1987.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology: Study of the Copper-T200 and Copper-7 intrauterine devices with modified insertion techniques. Am 5 Obstet Gynecol 120: 1 – 10, 1974.
Barranco VP: Eczematous dermatitis caused by internal exposure to copper. Arch Dermatol 106: 386, 1972.
Beling CG et al: Demonstration of chorionic gonadotropin during the second half of the cycle of women using IUD contraception. Am J Obstet Gynecol 125: 855, 1976.
Bernard RP: Factors governing IUD performance. Am J Public Health 61: 559 – 567, 1969.
British Medical Journal: Editorial: the nulliparous patient, the IUD and subsequent fertility. Br Med J 2 (6132): 233, 1978.
Burnhill MS: Prescriptive approaches to IUD usage. In: Intra- uterine devices, Wheeler RG et al (eds.), New York, Academic Press, 1974.
Byrnes AJ: Allergy to copper in intra-uterine devices. Med J Aust 2 (11): 532 – 533, 1978.
cOlCheng Chi I et al: An epidemiologic study of intrauterine contraceptive devices: a preliminary report. In: Risks, benefits, and controversies in fertility control, Sciarra JJ et al (eds.), New York, Harper and Row, 1978.
Eschenbach DA: Acute pelvic inflammatory disease etiology, risk factors, and pathogenesis. Clin Obstet Gynecol 19: 147, 1976.
Fiscina B, et al: Gonococcicidal action of copper in vitro. Am J Obstet Gynecol 116: 86, 1973.
Gibor Y, et al: Uterine.length: a prognostic indicator for successful use of the Copper-7 IUD. J Reprod Med 11(5): 205– 208, 1973.
Jain AK: Safety and effectiveness of intrauterine devices. Contraception 1 (3): 243, 1975a.
Jain AK: Comparative performance of three types of IUD in the United States. In: Analysis of intrauterine contraception, Hefnawi F, Segal SD (eds), Amsterdam, North-Holland Bio-medical Press, 1975b.
Jain AK, Moots B: Fecundability following the discontinuation of IUD use among Taiwanese women. J Biosoc Sei 9 (2): 137– 152, 1977.
Klein TA, et al: Absence of circulatory chorionic gonadotropin in wearers of IUDs. Am J Obstet Gynecol 129 (6): 626–628, 1977.
Liedhom P, et al: Two years experience with Copper-T200 in a Swedish population: a comparison between nulliparous and parous women. Contraception 10 (1): 55 – 61, 1974.
Lippes J, et al: The post-coital Copper-T. Adv Plann Parent 11 (1): 24 – 29, 1976.
Luthra VK et al.: Role of Cu IUD in cervical carcinogenesis: a followup of 36 months. Indian J Med Res 68: 78 – 83, 1978.
Measham AR, et al: The role of the family in post-partum family planning acceptance. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 12: 66 – 71, 1974.
Mishell DR Jr: In: Risks, benefits and controversies in fertility control, Sciarra JJ, et al (eds), New York, Harper and Row, 1978.
Mishell DR Jr, et al.: Pregnancy related complications and bleeding problems with IUDs. A study of the Copper-T intra-uterine device (T-Cu-200) in nulliparous women. Am J Obstet Gunecol 116: 1092, 1973.
Misra JS, et al: Cytological studies in women using copper intra-uterine devices. Acta Cytol Scand 21 (4): 514 – 8, 1977.
Newton JR, et al: Intrauterine contraception using the copper-7 device. Lancet 2: 951, 1972.
Newton JR, et al: In: Analysis of intrauterine contraception, Hefnawi F, Segal SJ (eds), Amsterdam, North-Holland Bio-medical Press, 1975.
Osser S, et al: Is development of PID in women using IUDs equal regardless of parity: one-year follow-up. Contraception 17 (6): 563, 1978.
Percival-Smith R: An educative approach to pelvic examination in young women. Can Family Physician 24: 357 – 361, 1978.
Reading AE, et al: The effects of psychological preparation on pain at intrauterine device insertion. Contraception 16 (5): 523 – 532, 1977.
Reading AE, et al: Psychological factors in IUD use: a review J Biosoc Sei 9: 317 – 323, 1977.
Rubinstein E: The Cu-7 device in chronic and IUD-induced acute cervicitis treated with oral estriol. Contraception 10 (6): 673 – 683, 1974.
Salmi T, et al: Cervical Bacterial flora in women fitted with a copper-releasing intrauterine contraceptive device (IUD). Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 55: 317, 1976.
Shaila NG et al: A comparative randomized double blind study of copper T 200 and copper 7 intrauterine contraceptive devices with modified insertion techniques. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 120 (1): 110, Sept 1974.
Sivin I: Copper-T IUD use and ectopic pregnancy rates in the United States. Contraception 19 (2): 151 – 174, 1979.
Snowden R, et al: Social and medical factors in the use and effectiveness of IUDs. J Biosoc Sei 5: 31 – 49, 1973.
Spellacy WW, et al: The effect of copper intrauterine devices on endocervical gonococcicidal cultures. Fertil Steril 25: 772, 1974.
Tatum H: Clinical aspects of intrauterine contraception: circumspection 1976. Obstet Gynecol Annu, 1978.
Tatum H, Schmidt F: Contraceptive and sterilization practices and extrauterine pregnancy: a realistic perspective. Fertil Steril 24 (4): 407 – 421, 1977.
Weiner E, et al: Copper intrauterine contraception devices in adolescent nullipara. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 85: 204 – 206, 1978.
Westrom L, et al: The risk of pelvic inflammatory disease in women using intrauterine contraceptive devices as compared with non-users. Lancet 2: 221, 1976.
Willson JR, et al: IUD: a comparison between their use in indigent and private patients. Obstet Gynecol 29: 59 – 66, 1967.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1980 Martinus Nijhoff Publishers bv, The Hague
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Smith, R.P. (1980). Copper IUDs in Nulliparous Women. In: Hafez, E.S.E., Van Os, W.A.A. (eds) Medicated Intrauterine Devices. Developments in Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol 5. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-8872-9_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-8872-9_11
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-009-8874-3
Online ISBN: 978-94-009-8872-9
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive