Abstract
At this point in the dialogue, Socrates invites Meno to make a fresh start. Meno professes, however, to be incapable of inquiry, claiming that Socrates has reduced him to a state of aporia or perplexity. Intellectually, Socrates has had the same numbing effect on Meno as the electric-ray inflicts physically on its victims. In the early dialogues when the respondent is driven into a state of aporia the conversation promptly concludes on a negative note. Not so with the Meno where Plato’s attempt to proceed beyond the point of impasse between the two disputants has been hailed as a laudable effort on his part to move beyond “destructive to constructive thinking, from elenchus and the refutation of other men’s views to the elaboration of positive views of his own.”84
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsRights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1980 Martinus Nijhoff Publishers bv, The Hague
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Thomas, J.E. (1980). Perplexity and Paradox (79e5–81a7). In: Musings on the Meno. Martinus Nijhoff Classical Philosophy Library, vol 1. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-8783-8_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-8783-8_9
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-247-2121-4
Online ISBN: 978-94-009-8783-8
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive