Skip to main content
  • 181 Accesses

Abstract

For the most part, I think Professor Benson has captured the spirit of the four articles that he has reviewed. In particular, I believe he responsibly articulates my multilectic approach to social scientific knowing. However, I would like to indicate a few subtle misinterpretations-due, I believe, to Benson’s unwillingness to accept the Zen paradigm in toto. Secondly, I would like to expand on the possibility of an integration/coupling of our organizational research endeavors. Finally, I reiterate my conclusions and heartily support Benson’s conclusions regarding the epistemological nature of social science.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Benson, J.K. Organizations: A dialectical view. American Science Quarterly, 1977, 22, 1–21. On the potentialities of middle range theory: Commentary on Bobko, Pinder and Moore, Sekaran et al., and Schuler. In C. Pinder and L. Moore (Eds.), Middle Range Theory and the Study of Organizations. Martinus Nijhoff, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, R.J. The Restructuring of Social and Political Thought. New York: Harcourt, Brace & Jovanovich, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darlington, R.B. Multiple regression in psychological research and practice. Psychological Bulletin, 1968, 69, 161–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinder, C., and Moore, L. The inevitability of multiple paradigms and the resultant need for middle range analysis in organization theory. In C. Pinder and L. Moore (Eds.), Middle Range Theory and the Study of Organizations. Martinus Nijhoff, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sekaran, U.; Martin, T.; Trafton; R., and Osborn, R. Nomothetical nets and higher order factor analysis in middle range theory development. In C. Pinder and L. Moore (Eds.), Middle Range Theory and the Study of Organizations. Martinus Nijhoff, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1980 Martinus Nijhoff Publishing

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bobko, P. (1980). Zen and Science. In: Pinder, C.C., Moore, L.F. (eds) Middle Range Theory and the Study of Organizations. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-8733-3_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-8733-3_13

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-009-8735-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-009-8733-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics